Automotive Radar Interference Mitigation via Artificial Doppler Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automotive radar systems face interference from other radar systems, leading to increased noise levels, masking of targets, and the appearance of ghost targets, which existing interference mitigation techniques have not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

The method involves transmitting radar waveforms with predetermined phase shifts, allowing for the decoding of range-Doppler information and identifying potential interference by comparing deviations in the received signals, thereby marking signals from the radar system itself and distinguishing them from interfering signals from other systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If radar systems operate at common carrier frequencies (24 GHz or 77 GHz) to enable widespread automotive applications, then system compatibility and coverage are improved, but mutual interference between different road users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compatibilityVSAvoidmutual interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by using different duty cycles for transmitting radar waveforms. Each radar system transmits in periodic intervals rather than continuously, allowing other systems to operate during the silent periods. This time-division approach reduces mutual interference while maintaining system compatibility across multiple radar users operating at the same carrier frequencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters by varying the duty cycle and transmission timing of radar waveforms. By dynamically adjusting when and how frequently radar systems transmit, the solution modifies the temporal characteristics of radar operation to avoid simultaneous transmissions that cause interference, while maintaining compatibility with standard radar frequencies and waveforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If interference mitigation techniques are applied in various domains (polarization, time, frequency, coding, space) as identified by MOSARIM, then interference reduction is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements interference mitigation through periodic transmission with variable duty cycles, which is a relatively simple time-domain approach compared to more complex techniques in polarization, frequency, or spatial domains. This method reduces interference by coordinating transmission intervals without requiring complex additional hardware or processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If continuous radar transmission is used to maintain constant surveillance, then target detection capability is improved, but interference with other radar systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection capabilityVSAvoidinterference to other systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic transmission with duty cycle variation to balance continuous surveillance needs with interference reduction. By transmitting radar waveforms in periodic intervals rather than continuously, the system maintains adequate target detection capability while creating silent periods that allow other radar systems to operate without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the duty cycle variable rather than fixed. The transmission intervals and duty cycles can be dynamically adjusted based on detected interference conditions, allowing the system to adapt its transmission pattern to maintain detection reliability while minimizing interference to other systems in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively identifies and mitigates potential interference, reducing the chances of ghost targets and hidden targets, ensuring accurate target detection and system functionality.

Implementation Method 1

transmitting a first sequence of radar waveforms towards a scene... transmitting at least a second sequence of radar waveforms towards the scene that differs from the first transmitted sequence of radar waveforms by predetermined phase shifts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase modulation: Phase Modulation

Implementation Method 2

receiving radar waveforms that have been transmitted by the radar transmitter unit and have been reflected by a target in the scene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

decoding range-Doppler information from the radar waveforms received by the radar receiving unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3610287B1Interference mitigation in automotive radar systems by artificial doppler modulation
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 IEE INT ELECTRONICS & ENG SA
  • EP3610287B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3610287B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3610287B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating an automotive radar system (10) for avoiding interference by other radar systems is provided. The automotive radar system (10) includes a radar transmitter unit (12) for transmitting radar waveforms (x Tx , x̃ Tx ,) towards a scene, a radar receiving unit (16) for receiving radar waveforms (x Rx, x̃ Rx ) that have been reflected by a target (26, 28) in the scene, and an evaluation and control unit (20) for decoding range-Doppler information from the received radar waveforms (x Rx, x̃ Rx ). The method comprises steps of transmitting (32) a first sequence of radar waveforms (x Tx ) and a second sequence of radar waveforms (x̃ Tx , k ) towards the scene that differs from the first transmitted sequence of radar waveforms (x Tx ) by predetermined phase shifts (φ k ) such that each radar waveform (x̃ Tx , k ) of the second sequence has a different predetermined phase shift (φ k ). First range-Doppler information and second range-Doppler information are decoded (36). Deviations of the second range-Doppler information from the first range-Doppler information are compared (44) to at least one predetermined deviation value. Based on the results of the comparing, a potential interference condition is identified (46).