Adaptive Radar Fall Detection via Sub-Area Point Cloud Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fall detection systems face issues with accuracy and privacy concerns, particularly with non-contact methods like radar devices that suffer from incomplete coverage leading to false or missed reports, and wearable devices that are inconvenient.

Innovation Solution

A fall detection system utilizing a radar, data generator, and classifier that processes point clouds from reflected radio waves, adaptively adjusting methods based on sub-areas within the detection zone to improve accuracy and reduce false or missed reports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a radar device is used to emit radio waves and analyze reflected radio waves for fall detection, then non-contact detection is achieved, but detection accuracy is reduced in partial areas leading to false reports or missed reports

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-contact detectionVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detecting area is divided into multiple sub-areas based on detection accuracy. The classifier is configured to adaptively process point clouds with different methods according to the sub-area in which the person lies, thereby improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining non-contact detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing methods are applied to different sub-areas of the detection zone. High-accuracy methods are used in areas with good radar coverage, while alternative methods are used in areas with lower coverage, optimizing detection accuracy locally across the entire detection area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If conventional radar detection methods are used uniformly across the entire detection area, then processing is simplified, but detection accuracy deteriorates in areas with poor radio wave reflection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing method uniformityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The processing method dynamically adapts based on the detected sub-area. The classifier automatically selects different processing approaches depending on where in the detection zone the target is located, making the system flexible and responsive to local conditions rather than applying a rigid uniform method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances fall detection accuracy by adaptively processing point clouds in different sub-areas, significantly reducing false and missed reports, thus facilitating timely medical intervention.

Implementation Method 1

a radar, a data generator, an area determining device and a classifier. The radar generates emitting radio waves and receives reflected radio waves from a person under detection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentEP4102248A1Fall detection system and method
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 CLIMAX TECH
  • EP4102248A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4102248A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4102248A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fall detection system includes a radar that generates emitting radio waves and receives reflected radio waves from a person under detection, a data generator that generates a point cloud according to the reflected radio waves, an area determining device that determines a sub-area of a detecting area in which the person under detection lies, and a classifier that determines whether the person under detection falls according to the point cloud. The classifier adaptively processes the point cloud with different methods according to sub-areas as determined by the area determining device respectively to determine whether the person under detection falls.