Radar Micro-Gesture Burst Rejection for Valid Gesture Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gesture recognition systems using optic and LIDAR sensors face limitations such as sensitivity to ambient lighting conditions, privacy concerns, and high cost, making them unsuitable for long-term use in devices like smartphones and smart home devices.

Innovation Solution

A burst-based non-gesture rejection method using a radar transceiver and processor to identify radar frames, extract features, compute burst attributes, and determine valid gestures for micro-gesture recognition, enabling efficient rejection of non-gestures in a micro-gesture recognition system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If optic sensor based solutions are used for gesture recognition, then gesture recognition performance is improved, but sensitivity to ambient lighting conditions and privacy concerns increase, and battery consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture recognition performanceVSAvoidsensitivity to ambient lighting conditions and privacy concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optic sensor based gesture recognition with radar-based gesture recognition. Radar uses electromagnetic waves to detect hand movements and gestures, eliminating sensitivity to ambient lighting conditions and privacy concerns associated with optical sensors. The radar transceiver and processor detect gestures through radio wave reflections, providing robust performance across various lighting environments while maintaining user privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If optic sensor based solutions are used for gesture recognition, then gesture recognition performance is improved, but battery consumption increases, making them unable to run for long periods of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture recognition performanceVSAvoidbattery consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes optic sensors with radar technology for gesture recognition. Radar-based systems consume significantly less power compared to optic sensor based solutions, enabling continuous operation for extended periods without requiring frequent battery recharges. The radar transceiver and processor efficiently detect gestures through radio wave reflections, maintaining low power consumption while preserving gesture recognition capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If LIDAR based solutions are used for gesture recognition, then lighting conditions and privacy challenges are overcome, but cost becomes prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting conditions and privacyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs radar-based gesture recognition instead of expensive LIDAR systems. Radar technology provides comparable advantages in handling lighting conditions and privacy issues at a fraction of the cost. The radar transceiver and processor detect hand movements and gestures through radio wave reflections, offering an affordable solution that maintains robust performance across various lighting environments while protecting user privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of energy

If burst-based non-gesture rejection is implemented, then power consumption is reduced and reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action through burst-based non-gesture rejection by analyzing radar signal bursts before committing to gesture recognition processing. The system pre-processes radar frames to identify and filter out non-gesture activities, reducing unnecessary processing and lowering power consumption. This preliminary filtering action maintains system reliability while managing computational resources efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes non-gesture radar signal bursts from the processing pipeline using burst-based rejection criteria. By identifying and extracting non-gesture bursts early in the processing sequence, the system reduces the computational burden on subsequent gesture recognition modules, thereby lowering overall power consumption and managing device complexity through targeted signal filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively distinguishes valid gestures from non-gestures, reducing power consumption and improving the reliability of gesture recognition systems, particularly in dynamic scenarios involving hand movements near the device.

Implementation Method 1

a transceiver configured to transmit and receive radar signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS12474782B2Burst-based non-gesture rejection in a micro-gesture recognition system
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12474782B2 patent drawing
  • US12474782B2 patent drawing
  • US12474782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device includes a transceiver configured to transmit and receive radar signals and a processor operatively coupled to the transceiver. The processor is configured to identify, based on the received radar signals, a plurality of radar frames related to an activity of a target. The processor is further configured to extract a plurality of features from the plurality of radar frames, compute burst attributes for the extracted features, predict a gesture based on the burst attributes, determine whether the predicted gesture is a valid gesture, and if the predicted gesture is a valid gesture, perform an action corresponding to the predicted gesture.