Radar Ground Truth Generation via Occupancy Grids

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating ground truth data for radar-based machine learning in driver assistance systems are limited by the need for expensive and time-consuming manual labeling or the use of additional sensors, which restricts the accuracy and efficiency of occupancy grid detection and underdrivability classification.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that generates ground truth data by utilizing sensor data from present, past, and future points in time, including the use of two maps (full-range and limited-range maps) to determine cell probabilities, allowing for automated labeling of underdrivable and non-underdrivable regions without requiring additional sensors or manual labeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual labeling or additional sensors (e.g., Lidar/camera) are used to generate ground truth data, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity, cost, and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground truth data accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The radar sensor generates its own ground truth data by processing its own sensor data through occupancy grid determination and underdrivability classification algorithms, eliminating the need for external sensors or manual labeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The method creates a virtual copy of the environment through occupancy grids and classification results that serve as ground truth data, replacing the need for physical additional sensors or manual creation of ground truth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual labeling or additional sensors are used to generate ground truth data, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground truth data accuracyVSAvoidground truth data generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The radar system automatically generates ground truth data through self-processing of its sensor data using machine learning models, eliminating the time-consuming manual labeling process and enabling rapid automated ground truth generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical labeling processes with automated computational algorithms that process radar data to generate occupancy grids and underdrivability classifications, significantly improving generation speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If additional sensors (e.g., Lidar/camera) are used to generate ground truth data, then measurement precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground truth data accuracyVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The radar sensor performs multiple functions: it both collects sensor data and generates ground truth data for machine learning training, eliminating the need for additional specialized sensors like Lidar or cameras

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The existing radar sensor serves itself by processing its own data to create ground truth, removing the need to purchase and integrate additional expensive sensing hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If radar sensor data from future points in time is used to determine ground truth data, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy grid detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method collects and stores sensor data from multiple future time points before using them to determine ground truth data for earlier time points, allowing more complete information to be available for accurate labeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses occupancy grids and underdrivability classification models as intermediaries that process and integrate information from multiple time points to produce accurate ground truth labels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220402504A1Methods and Systems for Generating Ground Truth Data
Publication Date: 2022.12.22 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US20220402504A1 patent drawing
  • US20220402504A1 patent drawing
  • US20220402504A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for generating ground truth data may include the following steps carried out by computer hardware components: for a plurality of points in time, acquiring sensor data for a respective point in time; and for at least a subset of the plurality of points in time, determining ground truth data of the respective point in time based on the sensor data of at least one present and/or past point of time and at least one future point of time.