Radar-Based Hazard Detection System for Construction Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety warning systems for drivers, particularly in construction zones and near emergency vehicles, are inadequate as they often fail to provide timely and targeted alerts, leading to a high risk of accidents due to transient hazards and lack of predictive capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An advanced warning and risk evasion system utilizing sensors, such as radar and GPS, coupled with visual and acoustic warning devices like the Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), to provide real-time hazard detection and targeted warnings to drivers, reducing false alarms and enhancing situational awareness for site management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional warning systems (signs, radio broadcasts) are used to alert drivers of hazards, then drivers can be warned of upcoming conditions, but the warning may be missed or require driver action (tuning radio) and cannot effectively warn of transient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection reliabilityVSAvoiddriver response requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces passive mechanical warning systems (signs, radio broadcasts requiring driver tuning) with an automated electronic detection and warning system. Radar sensors automatically detect hazards and the system electronically communicates warnings to drivers through the vehicle's existing audio system, eliminating the need for driver action to activate or tune the warning system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting hazards through radar sensors, calculating risk levels, and issuing warnings without requiring driver intervention. The system monitors conditions continuously and autonomously determines when and what to warn drivers about, reducing the operational burden on drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If radar detectors are used to alert drivers of police radar, then drivers can adjust speed to comply with limits, but the system only responds to police radar and not other hazardous conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection scopeVSAvoidcomprehensive hazard awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal hazard detection system that uses radar sensors to detect multiple types of hazards beyond just police radar. The system can identify emergency vehicles, construction equipment, and other obstacles, providing comprehensive hazard awareness through a single multi-functional detection platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If acoustic beam emitters are used to warn of train hazards, then only those in the warning zone hear the blast, but the system causes noise pollution and cannot be applied to road hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise pollutionVSAvoidapplication scope
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using directional acoustic beam emitters that focus warnings only in the specific zone where hazards exist. The warning energy is concentrated locally at the hazard location rather than being dispersed broadly, reducing noise pollution in areas without hazards while maintaining effective warning coverage where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If signs are physically placed by highway crews to warn of hazards, then drivers can be alerted to adjust speed, but the signs cannot warn of transient conditions and require manual placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to transient conditionsVSAvoidmanual placement requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by creating a mobile, automated warning system that can dynamically respond to changing conditions. Unlike static signs that require manual placement, the radar-based system continuously monitors conditions and automatically adjusts warnings in real-time, adapting to transient hazards as they appear and disappear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly increases the probability of detecting hazards and reduces accident risks by providing timely, targeted warnings to drivers, improving safety and efficiency in construction zones and other hazardous areas.

Implementation Method 1

The sensors may utilize one or more sensors and one or more sensor types, including radar-based sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

GPS devices, and/or differential GPS tracking devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGPS:

Implementation Method 3

coupled to visual, acoustic, and/or other projection modality warning devices, such as a Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) for providing a focused, acoustic warning to a small area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic beam emission: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS10953796B2Advanced warning and risk evasion system and method
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 CRH AMERICAS MATERIALS INC
  • US10953796B2 patent drawing
  • US10953796B2 patent drawing
  • US10953796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates in general to the field of safety devices, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to systems and methods for providing advanced warning and risk evasion when hazardous conditions exist. In one embodiment, a vicinity monitoring unit is provided for monitoring, for example, oncoming traffic near a construction zone. In some embodiments, the vicinity monitoring unit may be mounted onto a construction vehicle to monitor nearby traffic and send a warning signal if hazardous conditions exist. In some embodiments, personnel tracking units may be worn by construction workers and the personnel tracking units may be in communication with the vicinity monitoring unit. In some embodiments, a base station is provided for monitoring activities taking place in or near a construction site including monitoring the locations of various personnel and vehicles within the construction site.