Radar Image Evaluation with Reliability-Based Neural Network Fallback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radar image processing is computationally challenging, leading to increased processing latency or energy consumption, which is undesirable in mobile and vehicle safety applications.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize a trained neural network for rapid position estimation in radar images, falling back to a conventional radar processing pipeline when reliability criteria are not met, and employing continual or federated learning to enhance the neural network model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional radar processing pipeline is used to determine object positions, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time increases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between two processing pipelines based on reliability criteria. The neural network pipeline is used when reliability criteria are met (providing low latency), while the conventional pipeline is used as fallback when criteria are not met (ensuring accuracy). This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting the processing approach based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the processing parameters by switching between different algorithms (neural network vs. conventional pipeline) based on reliability criteria. This parameter change allows the system to optimize for either speed or accuracy depending on the situation, resolving the time-precision contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a conventional radar processing pipeline is used to determine object positions, then measurement precision is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition estimation accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts energy consumption by selecting the neural network pipeline when reliability criteria are met (lower energy usage) and switching to the conventional pipeline only when necessary (higher energy usage). This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction between accuracy and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the simpler neural network pipeline partially (when reliability criteria are met) instead of always using the full conventional pipeline. This partial action approach achieves acceptable accuracy with reduced energy consumption, resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If a simple processing approach is used, then processing speed is improved, but reliability of position estimation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidposition estimation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback through reliability criteria evaluation. The neural network output is evaluated against reliability criteria, and based on this feedback, the system decides whether to use the neural network results or fallback to the conventional pipeline. This feedback mechanism ensures reliability while maintaining speed when possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The reliability criteria act as an intermediary between the simple neural network approach and the reliable conventional pipeline. This intermediary evaluates the neural network output and determines whether it meets reliability standards, resolving the contradiction between speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12380589B2Method and apparatus to evaluate radar images and radar device
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US12380589B2 patent drawing
  • US12380589B2 patent drawing
  • US12380589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a method to evaluate radar images includes providing a first raw radar image and a second raw radar image and determining, whether a reliability criterion is fulfilled. The method further includes using a first coordinate and a second coordinate output by a trained neural network as an estimate of a position of an object if the reliability criterion is fulfilled, the trained neural network using the first raw radar image and the second raw radar image as an input. The method further includes using a third coordinate and a fourth coordinate output by another radar processing pipeline as the estimate of the position of the object if the reliability criterion is not fulfilled, the radar processing pipeline using the first raw radar image and the second raw radar image as an input.