Radar Interface Merging Live and Virtual Tracks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radar processing systems typically operate in either live or virtual modes, but not simultaneously, limiting the ability to maintain operational readiness through training scenarios that integrate simulated and live data.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for merging live and virtual radar data, tagging detections with virtual or live tags based on the presence of virtual data indicators, allowing concurrent tracking of live and virtual targets in a virtual-over-live environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If radar processing systems operate in virtual mode to train personnel, then training capability is improved, but operational readiness with live data is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining capabilityVSAvoidoperational readiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges virtual radar data and live radar data into a single processing stream, allowing the system to handle both training scenarios and operational data simultaneously. The radar interface combines virtual track data with live radar returns, enabling concurrent training exercises and operational readiness maintenance without requiring separate processing modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a virtual tag indicator as an intermediary mechanism to distinguish between virtual and live data within the merged stream. This tag allows the signal processing system to identify and appropriately handle virtual data elements while processing live data, enabling the system to maintain operational awareness during training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If radar processing systems operate in live mode for operational tracking, then operational readiness is improved, but training capability with simulated data is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational readinessVSAvoidtraining capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges virtual radar data and live radar data into a single processing stream, allowing the system to handle both training scenarios and operational data simultaneously. The radar interface combines virtual track data with live radar returns, enabling concurrent training exercises and operational readiness maintenance without requiring separate processing modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a virtual tag indicator as an intermediary mechanism to distinguish between virtual and live data within the merged stream. This tag allows the signal processing system to identify and appropriately handle virtual data elements while processing live data, enabling the system to maintain operational awareness during training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the system processes only live radar data, then processing simplicity is maintained, but training scenarios with simulated data cannot be executed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidtraining scenario execution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges virtual radar data and live radar data into a single processing stream, allowing the system to handle both training scenarios and operational data simultaneously. The radar interface combines virtual track data with live radar returns, enabling concurrent training exercises and operational readiness maintenance without requiring separate processing modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a virtual tag indicator as an intermediary mechanism to distinguish between virtual and live data within the merged stream. This tag allows the signal processing system to identify and appropriately handle virtual data elements while processing live data, enabling the system to maintain operational awareness during training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system processes only virtual radar data for training, then training scenarios can be executed, but operational tracking capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining scenario executionVSAvoidoperational tracking capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges virtual radar data and live radar data into a single processing stream, allowing the system to handle both training scenarios and operational data simultaneously. The radar interface combines virtual track data with live radar returns, enabling concurrent training exercises and operational readiness maintenance without requiring separate processing modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a virtual tag indicator as an intermediary mechanism to distinguish between virtual and live data within the merged stream. This tag allows the signal processing system to identify and appropriately handle virtual data elements while processing live data, enabling the system to maintain operational awareness during training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7612710B2Processing virtual and live tracks to form a virtual-over-live environment
Publication Date: 2009.11.03 RAYTHEON CO
  • US7612710B2 patent drawing
  • US7612710B2 patent drawing
  • US7612710B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a method includes receiving live radar data, receiving virtual radar data, merging the live radar data and the virtual radar data to form merged data, and tagging the merged data with a virtual tag indicator to indicate a presence of the virtual radar data. The method also includes for each receive time window, determining if the virtual radar data is present from the virtual tag indicator; if the virtual radar data is present, tagging a detection with a virtual tag and if the virtual radar data is not present, tagging detections with a live tag.