Communication Tower Radar Interference Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radars and communication towers can cause interference when operating on similar frequencies, leading to disruptions in data detection and communication, particularly when they are in close proximity.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for detecting interference data in communication towers, which involves monitoring traffic load and signal levels to identify periodic interference with radars, allowing for beamforming modifications to minimize or avoid interference by redirecting communication tower beams during low traffic periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If communication towers and radars operate on similar frequencies in close proximity, then communication service coverage and radar detection capability are maintained, but mutual interference occurs disrupting data detection and communication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of radar signals during low traffic periods to identify interference patterns, periodicity, and duration before they affect normal communication operations. This advance detection allows the beamforming parameters to be pre-adjusted to avoid interference when radars are active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic beamforming parameter adjustment based on detected radar interference characteristics. The system continuously monitors traffic load and radar signals, then adapts beam direction, width, and timing in real-time to minimize interference while maintaining communication reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If beamforming parameters are continuously adjusted to avoid radar interference, then interference is minimized, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs interference detection and beamforming parameter adjustment periodically during low traffic periods rather than continuously. By detecting radar patterns during these windows and applying the learned parameters during high traffic periods, the system reduces computational complexity while maintaining effective interference avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own low traffic periods to detect and learn radar interference patterns, then applies this self-acquired knowledge to avoid interference during high traffic periods. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external interference management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If interference detection is performed during high traffic periods, then real-time interference avoidance is achieved, but communication service quality deteriorates due to reduced available bandwidth

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidcommunication throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs interference detection and beamforming parameter optimization during low traffic periods before the actual communication demand arises. This preliminary action ensures that when high traffic periods occur, the system can immediately apply pre-optimized parameters without sacrificing communication throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic detection during low traffic periods followed by application during high traffic periods. This alternating pattern ensures that interference avoidance measures are in place before communication intensity increases, preventing any degradation in service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9594153B1Detecting interference data in association with radars
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US9594153B1 patent drawing
  • US9594153B1 patent drawing
  • US9594153B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for facilitating detection of interference data in association with radars are provided. In some embodiments, signal levels at a communication tower are monitored. In accordance with the monitored signal levels, a periodic interference associated with a radar remote from the communication tower is recognized based on a pattern of signal levels monitored. Interference data associated with the periodic interference is calculated. Such interference data may include, for example, an interference periodicity and an interference duration.