FMCW Radar Interference Detection via Beat Signal Extremal Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automotive FMCW radar systems face challenges in accurately detecting interference from other radar systems, leading to unreliable detection of target object distances and relative speeds, especially in the presence of multiple targets or large obstacles beyond the measuring range.

Innovation Solution

The method involves calculating amplitude differences and identifying extremal points in the beat signal over time to determine interference, using the periodicity of these points to identify irregular patterns and determine if interference is occurring, thereby reducing computational costs and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If FMCW radar transmits and receives signals to detect target characteristics, then target detection capability is improved, but interference from other radar systems occurs causing unreliable detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection reliabilityVSAvoidradar interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting extremal points in the beat signal before performing full frequency analysis. By identifying and counting extremal points in advance, the system can detect interference patterns early in the signal processing chain, preventing unreliable target detection before it occurs. This preliminary detection of signal characteristics allows the system to flag potential interference issues before they corrupt the final target measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If traditional interference detection methods are used, then interference detection capability is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential feature for interference detection - the extremal points of the beat signal - rather than processing the entire signal spectrum. By taking out and counting only these critical points, the system achieves interference detection with minimal computational effort. This extraction approach eliminates the need for complex full-spectrum analysis while maintaining the ability to detect interference patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a simple counting mechanism instead of complex computational algorithms. The extremal point counter provides a low-cost, computationally inexpensive method for interference detection. This disposable-like simplicity in the detection mechanism allows the system to achieve interference detection capability without investing in expensive or complex computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If FMCW radar operates in environments with multiple targets or large obstacles, then measurement coverage is improved, but detection accuracy decreases due to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoiddistance and speed measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary detection of extremal points in the beat signal to identify interference conditions before they affect target measurements. By detecting the presence of interference patterns early, the system can flag or correct for potential accuracy issues in distance and speed measurements, maintaining reliability even in complex environments with multiple targets or large obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable detection of interference and accurate measurement of target characteristics, even with multiple targets or large obstacles, by utilizing the periodicity of extremal points in the beat signal, enhancing the radar's ability to distinguish between noise and actual interference.

Implementation Method 1

The transmitted electromagnetic energy is reflected by a target object and received by the radar receiver. The received signal is shifted due to Doppler effect by movement of the target object relative to the radar.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 2

The FMCW radar mixes the transmission signal and the received signal to produce a beat signal.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency mixing: Heterodyne

Data Source

PatentUS7728762B2Method for detecting interference in radar system and radar using the same
Publication Date: 2010.06.01 DENSO CORP
  • US7728762B2 patent drawing
  • US7728762B2 patent drawing
  • US7728762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting an occurrence of interference between a return of a radar wave which has been transmitted by a radar and has an oscillating amplitude in time and a radio wave transmitted by some other radar, Includes steps of: detecting extremal points of an incident radio wave in which the radio wave transmitted by the other radar is superposed on the return of the radar wave, extracting, sequentially in time, an emerging pattern of the extremal points of the incident radio wave within each of periods of time to obtain a series of emerging patterns of the extremal points, detecting a period during which the emerging pattern of the extremal points is irregular among the series of the emerging patterns of the extremal points, and determining that the interference occurs during the detected period of time.