Vehicle Radar Interference Signaling for NLOS Detection Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing interference between vehicle-mounted radars reduces radar detection efficiency and increases false alarm or missed detection probabilities, particularly in scenarios like intersections and T-junctions, due to non-line-of-sight cases and spatial distribution, affecting driving safety and comfort.

Innovation Solution

A detection method and apparatus that involves listening for signals from different directions and transmitting signals to indicate predicted interference time-frequency ranges, allowing other radars to adjust their detection signals to avoid interference, thereby improving accuracy and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If interference listening technology is used to avoid signal interference, then the probability of false alarm and missed detection is reduced, but the time required for listening increases, which reduces the time available for target detection in scenarios like intersections and T-junctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidlistening time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having radars pre-share their time-frequency resource occupation status through signaling before actual detection occurs. This allows other radars to advance-know about potential interference and adjust their listening and detection strategies accordingly, reducing the time needed for actual interference listening at critical moments like intersections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where radars transmit signaling information about their transmit signals (including time-frequency ranges) to other radars. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of detection parameters based on real-time interference conditions, optimizing the balance between listening time and detection accuracy without requiring excessive listening duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If vehicle-mounted radar penetration rate increases, then more vehicles can benefit from radar detection, but mutual interference between radars becomes increasingly severe, reducing detection efficiency and increasing false alarm probability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar detection coverageVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces signaling information as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between multiple radars. This signaling system acts as a communication layer that allows radars to coordinate their operations by sharing time-frequency resource status, thereby reducing mutual interference while maintaining high penetration rates and detection coverage across the vehicle fleet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting radar detection parameters (such as time-frequency ranges) based on received signaling information from other radars. This allows each radar to adapt its operating parameters in real-time to avoid interference, maintaining detection accuracy even as the overall number of radars in the system increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If radars use the same time-frequency resources for detection, then detection efficiency is maximized, but interference between radars increases, causing false alarms and missed detections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidinterference signal
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the time-frequency resources into distinct segments that are allocated to different radars based on their signaling information. Instead of allowing all radars to use the entire time-frequency spectrum simultaneously, the system segments resource usage coordinates through signaling, reducing interference while maintaining overall detection efficiency through coordinated resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the accuracy of target detection by vehicle-mounted radars, especially at intersections, by predicting and avoiding interference, thus improving driving safety and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

a radar 101 may transmit a sounding signal outwards, and receive an echo signal reflected by a target object 102

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave propagation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

receive an echo signal reflected by a target object 102

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

a receive antenna of the radar 101 may also receive a transmit signal of the radar 103

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic signal reception: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP4261570B1Detection method, detection device, detection system, and radar
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 YINWANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • EP4261570B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4261570B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4261570B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

This application discloses a detection method, a detection apparatus (260), a detection system, and a radar. The method includes: listening for at least one signal coming from at least one direction (S 1001), where the at least one signal includes a first signal corresponding to a first direction; and transmitting a second signal toward a second direction, where the second signal is used to indicate a predicted interference time-frequency range (S 1002), and time-frequency ranges of the first signal and the second signal meet at least one of the following: a frequency domain range of the first signal is a subset of a frequency domain range of the second signal; or a time domain range of the first signal is a subset of a time domain range of the second signal. The interference time-frequency range is indicated to the second direction by transmitting the second signal, so that a second detection apparatus (270) obtains the interference time-frequency range of a non-line-of-sight area, thereby improving accuracy of target detection by the second detection apparatus (270). The solution may be further used in the field of self driving, intelligent driving, or unmanned driving, to improve an interference avoiding capability of a vehicle, and improve driving safety of the vehicle.