Radar Target Localization via Multilateration and Velocity Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar systems face challenges in accurately localizing targets in a 360° environment with high separability and minimizing ambiguities, particularly when using single-channel sensors with overlapping fields of view, due to limited angular resolution and the need for multiple sensors to cover a wide field of view.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising multiple single-channel radar sensors with overlapping fields of view, where simultaneous radar signal measurements are used to derive range information, determine intersection points, and select regions of high density to estimate the most likely target position, utilizing multilateration and velocity information to improve localization accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If beam forming or beam steering is used for target localization, then angular separability is improved, but the number of antenna elements and signal processing channels increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular separabilityVSAvoidnumber of antenna elements and signal processing channels
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the 360° environment into multiple overlapping fields of view from different sensor locations. Each sensor handles a portion of the scene, and the results are combined through multilateration, avoiding the need for a single complex beam-forming system to cover all directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multilateration as an intermediary method that combines range information from multiple simple sensors to achieve accurate localization without requiring complex signal processing or phase synchronization between sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of beam forming sensors are used to cover 360° environment, then field of view coverage is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield of view coverageVSAvoidnumber of sensors and system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the 360° coverage task across multiple distributed sensors with overlapping fields of view. Each sensor is simple and low-cost, but together they provide complete environmental coverage through geometric distribution rather than requiring complex individual sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple copies of simple single-channel sensors distributed in space, rather than one complex multi-channel sensor. The redundancy of having multiple simple sensors is compensated by the multilateration algorithm that fuses their measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If multilateration is used with distributed sensors, then device complexity is reduced, but localization ambiguities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing channelsVSAvoidlocalization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves ambiguities by adding the temporal dimension through velocity measurements. By combining range information (spatial dimension) with velocity information (temporal dimension), the system can disambiguate target positions that would otherwise be indistinguishable from range data alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses velocity measurements as feedback to resolve ambiguities in position estimation. The velocity information provides additional constraints that help the multilateration algorithm select the correct target position among multiple possible solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances target localization precision and reduces ambiguities by correlating range and velocity data from distributed sensors, allowing for accurate estimation of target position and movement without the need for complex phase synchronization or extensive signal processing channels.

Implementation Method 1

obtain range and velocity information of the potential target from radar signal measurements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS11762085B2Device, system and method for localization of a target in a scene
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US11762085B2 patent drawing
  • US11762085B2 patent drawing
  • US11762085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device comprising circuitry configured to: obtain radar signal measurements simultaneously acquired by two or more radar sensors having overlapping fields of view, derive range information of one or more potential targets from samples of radar signal measurements of said two or more radar sensors acquired at the same time or during the same time interval, the range information of a single sample representing a ring segment of potential positions of a potential target at a particular range from the respective radar sensor in its field of view, determine intersection points of ring segments of the derived range information, determine a region of the scene having one of the highest densities of intersection points, select a ring segment per sensor that goes through the selected region, and determine the most likely target position of the potential target from the derived range information of the selected ring segments.