Radar-Based Obstruction Light Control for Aviation Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Light pollution from obstruction lights on wind turbines and other structures is a significant issue, causing energy wastage, disrupting astronomical observations, and negatively impacting local communities due to excessive lighting, which is unnecessary and annoying.

Innovation Solution

A radar-based system that monitors the presence of airborne vehicles and turns on/off obstruction lights only when necessary, using a network of radar units and controllers to manage light usage dynamically, thereby reducing unnecessary lighting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If obstruction lights are kept on continuously to ensure aviation safety, then safety is improved, but energy consumption increases and light pollution worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaviation safetyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static continuous lighting to dynamic conditional lighting. The system uses radar detection to dynamically adjust light operation based on real-time aircraft presence, making the lighting system adaptive rather than fixed. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining safety reliability only when needed (when aircraft are detected) while reducing energy consumption during periods without aircraft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through radar detection systems that continuously monitor for aircraft and provide real-time information to the light control system. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to respond to actual safety needs rather than operating blindly, enabling lights to be activated only when aircraft are present in the vicinity, thus maintaining safety while reducing unnecessary energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If obstruction lights are kept on continuously to ensure aviation safety, then safety is improved, but light pollution worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaviation safetyVSAvoidlight pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts lighting based on detected aircraft presence, switching from continuous static operation to conditional dynamic operation. This reduces light pollution by eliminating unnecessary illumination during periods when no aircraft are present, while maintaining safety when aircraft are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Radar-based feedback mechanisms detect aircraft presence and trigger appropriate lighting responses. This feedback loop ensures lights are activated only when safety is actually needed, preventing unnecessary light pollution during periods without aircraft while maintaining reliable safety coverage when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If radar-based dynamic control is implemented, then energy consumption is reduced and light pollution decreases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by integrating multiple functions into a unified system. The radar system serves dual purposes: detecting aircraft for safety purposes and simultaneously controlling lighting operations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate control mechanisms, managing complexity while achieving energy reduction goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that processes radar detection data and translates it into lighting control decisions. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system architecture by providing a centralized intelligence that coordinates between radar detection and light activation, managing complexity through structured mediation rather than direct complex interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If radar units and control networks are deployed, then light usage is optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight usage efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control network and radar units are integrated into a multi-functional system that simultaneously achieves aircraft detection, lighting control, and energy optimization. This universality allows a single deployed system to accomplish multiple objectives, improving light usage efficiency while managing complexity through functional integration rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces light pollution by minimizing the duration of obstruction light usage, conserving energy, addressing community concerns about visual impact, and lowering bird fatalities, while maintaining safety standards for aviation.

Implementation Method 1

a radar unit configured to monitor a volume surrounding or containing at least one obstruction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS7982659B2Method and system for reducing light pollution
Publication Date: 2011.07.19 TERMA AS
  • US7982659B2 patent drawing
  • US7982659B2 patent drawing
  • US7982659B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for preventing light pollution includes one or more radar units that monitor for vehicles in a volume surrounding or containing one or more obstructions having one or more obstruction lights. A master radar detection processing unit receives sensed radar detection information from the one or more radar units with associated radar signal processing units and determines whether a vehicle is present within the monitored volume. A plurality of obstruction light controller units are interconnected in a network, such as a wireless network. Each obstruction light controller unit turns on an obstruction light when a vehicle enters the monitored volume or a failure condition exists, and turns off the obstruction light when the vehicle has vacated the monitored volume and no failure condition exists. The one or more radar units can transmit sensed radar detection information to a master radar detection processing unit via the network.