Radar Object Classification via Phase Change Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional radar devices cannot determine the type of front objects, such as vehicles or pedestrians, based on received echoes, and struggle to distinguish between different types of objects due to phase changes exceeding π, leading to incorrect object classification.

Innovation Solution

A radar device with a transmitting and receiving system, change amount calculation, probability distribution memory, and judgment mechanism that adjusts the wavelength and observation period to calculate the change in signal intensity and phase, allowing for accurate object type identification by analyzing the probability distribution of signal fluctuations from various objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional radar devices use standard wavelength and observation period, then basic detection function is maintained, but object type classification accuracy deteriorates due to phase changes exceeding π

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject type classification accuracyVSAvoidphase change stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the wavelength and observation period parameters to ensure that phase changes remain within a controllable range (not exceeding π), thereby enabling accurate object type classification while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the observation period based on the calculated phase changes, allowing the radar to optimize its detection window to capture meaningful signal variations without exceeding phase ambiguity thresholds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If radar devices increase detection sensitivity to identify object types, then classification capability improves, but false detection probability increases due to clutter interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject type detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse detection probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the detected phase change patterns are continuously compared against expected patterns for different object types, allowing the system to distinguish true objects from clutter while maintaining high classification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces phase change analysis as an intermediary measurement that bridges basic detection and object type classification, enabling the system to filter out clutter signals that do not exhibit characteristic phase change patterns of actual objects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If conventional radar devices use fixed observation period, then system complexity is reduced, but ability to capture accurate signal intensity changes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structure simplicityVSAvoidsignal intensity change accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The observation period is made dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the radar system to adapt the measurement window based on the specific detection scenario and phase change characteristics, thereby improving signal intensity change accuracy without requiring complex additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the radar device to accurately identify and differentiate between types of front objects, such as vehicles and pedestrians, improving safety features by providing precise object classification for vehicle control systems.

Implementation Method 1

a transmitting and receiving means for emitting radar waves and for receiving echoes of signals of the radar waves which are reflected by various types of objects as detection targets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

echoes of signals of the radar waves which are reflected by various types of objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

a detection means for detecting a signal intensity of each arrival echo on the basis of the received signals of the arrival echo received by the transmitting and receiving means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal intensity detection:

Implementation Method 4

a change amount calculation means for calculating a change amount of the signal intensity of the current arrival echo with respect to a previous arrival echo

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal change detection:

Data Source

PatentUS8686893B2Radar device
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 DENSO CORP
  • US8686893B2 patent drawing
  • US8686893B2 patent drawing
  • US8686893B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A signal processing unit in a radar device calculates a change amount Y (=log(P)−log(Pb)) between a power P of a current arrival echo and a power of a previous arrival echo arrived before an observation period TSW. A memory unit in the radar device stores, every type of objects, a probability distribution of the change amount Y calculated from the arrival echo from the object. On the basis of the calculated change amount Y and the probability distribution, the signal processing unit determines a probability Pr to obtain the change amount Y every type of object, and determines that the object having the maximum probability Pr is the object which transmits the current arrival echo.