Radar Precipitation Error Correction Using Gauge Differentials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring rainfall using radar devices face inaccuracies due to variations in atmospheric conditions and drop sizes, leading to uncertainties in precipitation estimates, which can result in incorrect conclusions about flooding risks and crop growth modeling.

Innovation Solution

An agricultural intelligence computer system that computes radar-based precipitation estimate errors through inverse distance weighting of gauge radar differential values, using a combination of gauge measurements and radar data to provide a range of possible precipitation values with corresponding likelihoods, thereby improving accuracy and informing decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If radar reflectivity is used to measure rainfall rate, then coverage area is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to atmospheric conditions and drop size variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidrainfall rate measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines radar reflectivity data with ground-based gauge measurements to create a hybrid precipitation estimation system. The gauge radar differential values merge the broad coverage of radar with the high precision of gauges, resolving the contradiction between coverage area and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces gauge radar differential values as an intermediary that bridges radar reflectivity and actual precipitation measurements. These differential values act as a mediator to correct radar estimates using gauge data, improving precision while maintaining coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If rain gauges are used to measure precipitation, then measurement precision is improved, but coverage area deteriorates due to limited physical placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecipitation measurement accuracyVSAvoidcoverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the high precision of rain gauge measurements with the broad coverage of radar by computing gauge radar differential values. This combination allows the system to achieve both accurate measurements and extensive spatial coverage simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the coverage of point-based gauge measurements to areal coverage by computing differential values that represent precipitation errors across spatial dimensions. This transforms localized gauge data into region-wide correction information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If radar calibration techniques are applied, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to unmeasured actual error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar measurement accuracyVSAvoiderror estimation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using actual gauge measurements to compute differential values that reflect the true error in radar estimates. This feedback mechanism continuously corrects radar measurements, improving both precision and reliability of error estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical calibration techniques with a computational approach using gauge radar differential values. This substitution allows for more reliable error measurement by directly comparing radar estimates with actual gauge measurements rather than relying on calibration assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If a single precipitation estimate is provided, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of information increases due to unrepresented uncertainty range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making simplicityVSAvoidprecipitation uncertainty information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the precipitation estimate into multiple possible values with corresponding likelihoods rather than providing a single estimate. This segmentation preserves uncertainty information while maintaining ease of interpretation through probabilistic categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from a single deterministic value to a probabilistic distribution of possible values. This parameter transformation retains complete information about uncertainty while presenting results in an easily interpretable format for decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of rainfall measurements by accounting for spatial and temporal variations, allowing for more precise flood risk assessment and crop growth modeling, enabling farmers to make informed decisions.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing radar data to calculate the rainfall. Generally, a polarized beam of energy is emitted from a radar device in a particular direction. The beam travels un-disturbed before encountering a volume of air containing hydrometeors, such as rainfall, snowfall, or hail, which causes the beam to scatter energy back to a radar receiver.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

The beam travels un-disturbed before encountering a volume of air containing hydrometeors, such as rainfall, snowfall, or hail, which causes the beam to scatter energy back to a radar receiver.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

The rain gauges are set at a variety of locations and are used to gather precipitation and measure the amount of precipitation received at the rain gauge over a period of time.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentEP3465257B1Computing radar based precipitation estimate errors based on precipitation gauge measurements
Publication Date: 2021.03.24 CLIMATE CORP
  • EP3465257B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3465257B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP3465257B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In an embodiment, a system receives a first plurality of values representing precipitation gauge measurements at a plurality of gauge locations. The system obtains a second plurality of values representing radar based precipitation estimates at the plurality of gauge locations. For each radar based precipitation estimate value at the plurality of gauge locations, the system identifies one or more corresponding precipitation gauge measurement values, computes a gauge radar differential value for the radar based precipitation estimate, and stores the gauge radar differential value with location data identifying a corresponding location of the plurality of gauge locations. The system obtains a particular radar based precipitation estimate at a non-gauge location. The system determines that one or more particular gauge radar differential values at one or more particular gauge locations correspond to the particular radar based precipitation estimate and computes a particular radar based precipitation estimate error at the non-gauge location.