Precision Radar Registration Using ADS-B Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Legacy radar registration algorithms are inadequate for multi-sensor environments, particularly when incorporating ADS-B data, as they can lead to unstable solutions and require complex data collection processes, limiting their usability in areas with low traffic or partial ADS-B coverage.

Innovation Solution

The Precision Radar Registration (PR2) algorithm uses geo-referenced ADS-B data to correct registration bias by interpolating target histories and applying Linear Regression Analysis, eliminating the need for a tracker and allowing registration analysis on radars not actively participating in tracking functions, providing stable and accurate range, azimuth, and time bias parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If legacy radar-pair registration algorithms are used in multi-sensor environments with ADS-B, then registration correction can be achieved, but the solutions become unstable and oscillating when multiple sensors are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration correction accuracyVSAvoidsolution stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary coordinate transformation system that converts all sensor measurements (radar and ADS-B) into a common reference frame before performing registration analysis. This intermediary step decouples the registration problem from the inherent instabilities of multi-sensor coordinate systems, allowing stable correction parameters to be derived even when combining multiple sensor types with different accuracy characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the registration problem by changing the mathematical parameters used in the analysis. Instead of directly comparing raw sensor outputs, the system applies coordinate transformations and uses a modified least-squares optimization approach that incorporates covariance weighting. This parameter transformation stabilizes the solution by accounting for the different accuracy levels of various sensors in a mathematically rigorous way.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If legacy registration algorithms are used with sensors of large differences in accuracy, then registration can be performed, but the algorithms do not support sensors with large differences in accuracy and require complex weighting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-sensor compatibilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal registration framework that can handle any combination of sensor types (radar, ADS-B, or both) without requiring separate algorithms for each sensor pairing. The unified approach uses consistent coordinate transformations and optimization methods regardless of which sensors are present, simplifying the overall system while maintaining the ability to handle large differences in sensor accuracy through proper covariance weighting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If separate collections in two regions are required for R2E4 algorithm, then registration parameters can be determined, but usability is limited or excluded in areas of low traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration parameter accuracyVSAvoidusability in low traffic areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the registration problem into independent per-sensor corrections rather than requiring paired comparisons from two separate regions. By processing each sensor's data independently against a common reference frame and then combining the corrections, the system can achieve accurate registration using data from a single region, making it usable in low-traffic areas where multiple regional samples would be unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of time

If a single-sensor tracker is implemented within the registration function, then accurate time extrapolated positions can be provided, but algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime alignment accuracyVSAvoidtracker implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary time alignment of all sensor measurements to a common reference time before the registration analysis. By pre-synchronizing the temporal coordinates of radar and ADS-B measurements using known sensor timing characteristics, the system eliminates the need for a complex tracker-based time extrapolation system within the registration function, reducing overall complexity while maintaining accurate time alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8054215B2Precision registration for radar
Publication Date: 2011.11.08 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US8054215B2 patent drawing
  • US8054215B2 patent drawing
  • US8054215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A precision radar registration (PR2) system and method that employs highly accurate geo-referenced positional data as a basis for correcting registration bias present in radar data. In one embodiment, the PR2 method includes sample collection and bias computation function processes. The sample collection process includes ADS-B sample collection, radar sample collection, and time alignment sub-processes. The bias computation function process includes bias computation, quality monitoring and non-linear effects monitoring sub-processes. The bias computation sub-process results in a bias correction solution including range bias bρ, azimuth bias bθ, and time bias bT parameters. The quality monitoring sub-process results in an estimate of solution quality. The non-linear effects monitoring sub-process results in detection of the presence of non-linear bias, if any, in the bias correction solution.