Radar Return Processing With Vector Histograms for Weak Targets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radar systems face challenges in efficiently processing large volumes of data from ubiquitous radar systems, which require high processing capacity and often discard valuable low-amplitude target information due to high detection thresholds, leading to inefficient and volatile processing burdens.

Innovation Solution

A radar system utilizing a vector histogram data structure that processes return signals without explicit threshold tests, storing and processing all signal data, including low-amplitude information, to enable efficient parallel processing and maintain target information continuity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high detection thresholds are used to reduce processing burden, then processing load is reduced, but valuable low-amplitude target information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidtarget information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates low-amplitude signal processing from the main detection pipeline by using dedicated low-amplitude detection thresholds and separate processing paths. This allows low-amplitude target information to be preserved and processed independently without burdening the main processing system, thus resolving the contradiction between reducing processing load and preserving target information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements multiple detection thresholds (high, medium, low) that can be dynamically selected based on signal amplitude characteristics. By changing the detection threshold parameter according to signal strength, the system can process strong signals efficiently while preserving weak signal information, thus resolving the contradiction between processing efficiency and information preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If explicit threshold tests are used to filter signals, then processing is simplified, but target information continuity is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidtarget information continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of return signals into different amplitude categories before main processing. By pre-sorting signals into high, medium, and low amplitude groups with appropriate thresholds, the system simplifies subsequent processing while maintaining continuous tracking of targets across different amplitude states, thus resolving the contradiction between processing simplicity and information continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If high processing capacity is allocated to handle all signal data, then complete target information is preserved, but system resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget information preservationVSAvoidprocessing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial processing by using different detection thresholds and processing paths for different signal amplitude categories. Instead of processing all signals with the same high-capacity pipeline, the system applies appropriate processing levels to each signal type, preserving complete target information while optimizing resource consumption by avoiding excessive processing of signals that don't require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system retains valuable target information, reduces unpredictable processing loads, and enhances data analysis efficiency by allowing for more predictable and effective parallel processing of radar data.

Implementation Method 1

at least one radar transmitter configured to transmit a sequence of pulses to illuminate a volume of radar coverage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

at least one radar receiver configured to receive corresponding return signals reflected from within the volume of radar coverage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4396602B1Radar system and associated apparatus and methods
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 OSWALD GORDON KENNETH ANDREW
  • EP4396602B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4396602B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP4396602B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a radar system. At least one radar receiver is configured to receive return signals reflected from within a volume of radar coverage. Means for processing the return signals is configured to: extract characteristics from a return signal received in a corresponding coherent processing interval, the extracted characteristics comprising a set of frequencies and/or a set of times, each frequency and/or time having a respective extracted amplitude of a corresponding set of extracted amplitudes; determine a corresponding amplitude index for each extracted amplitude of the set of extracted amplitudes; and for each extracted amplitude: respectively store, in a memory location addressable via the corresponding amplitude index, a set of return signal related data comprising information for identifying the corresponding frequency and/or time, and an associated identifier for uniquely identifying, in combination with the amplitude index, that set of return signal related data.