Radar RFBIST Using Multiple Oscillators to Eliminate Settling Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar systems face challenges in minimizing settling time between chirp transmissions, which reduces the efficiency of RF transmission and increases the risk of faults going undetected, especially in autonomous vehicle applications where real-time data is critical.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system with multiple oscillators or transmitters that allow for simultaneous operation, where one oscillator or transmitter can settle while another is in use, effectively eliminating or minimizing the settling time between chirp transmissions, and incorporating a built-in self-test (RFBIST) mechanism to verify signal integrity and detect faults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single oscillator or transmitter is used in the radar system, then the device complexity is reduced, but the settling time between chirp transmissions increases, reducing transmission efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of oscillatorsVSAvoidsettling time between chirp transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the oscillator system into multiple independent oscillators (first oscillator and second oscillator) that operate independently. This segmentation allows one oscillator to be in use while another settles, eliminating the settling time bottleneck that would exist in a single-oscillator system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the standby oscillator begin settling before the active oscillator completes its transmission cycle. This overlapping timing ensures that when the active oscillator finishes, the standby oscillator is already ready to take over immediately, eliminating idle settling time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If multiple oscillators or transmitters are implemented to eliminate settling time, then the transmission efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of oscillators
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functionality of multiple oscillators into a unified system where they share common control logic and alternating operation. This combining approach allows the system to achieve the benefits of multiple oscillators (continuous operation without settling time) while managing complexity through coordinated rather than completely independent operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through the alternating operation of oscillators. The first oscillator operates during one period while the second oscillator prepares, then they switch roles in subsequent periods. This periodic alternation ensures continuous transmission efficiency while organizing the complexity of multiple oscillators into a regular, manageable pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Duration of action of stationary object

If the settling time is minimized through multiple oscillators, then the RF transmission continuity is improved, but the system requires more components increasing the risk of faults

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRF transmission continuityVSAvoidfault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through the RFBIST mechanism that continuously monitors the operation of each oscillator and transmitter. This feedback system detects faults in real-time and can switch to backup components, thereby maintaining reliability despite the increased number of components required for continuous transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by incorporating redundant oscillators and transmitters that are prepared in advance as backups. If a fault is detected in the active component, the system can immediately switch to the pre-prepared standby component, cushioning against the reliability risks introduced by having multiple active components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If built-in self-test mechanism is incorporated to detect faults, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidtest mechanism components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through the RFBIST mechanism that enables the radar system to automatically test and diagnose its own components without external intervention. This self-testing capability improves reliability by detecting faults early while minimizing the added complexity compared to external test systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing the RFBIST mechanism to test multiple components (oscillators, transmitters, receivers) through a unified test architecture. This multi-functional approach improves reliability across all components while avoiding the complexity of having separate dedicated test mechanisms for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11921195B2Apparatus and method of RF built in self-test (RFBIST) in a radar system
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 ARBE ROBOTICS LTD
  • US11921195B2 patent drawing
  • US11921195B2 patent drawing
  • US11921195B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel and useful safety functionality assurance mechanism incorporating an RF built in self-test (RFBIST) system in a radar system having a plurality of transmitter devices and receiver devices. The RFBIST functions to verify, inter alia, that the transmitted signal is operating correctly and that all channels transmit a proper, valid or ‘legal’ signal and that the receiver devices are also operating correctly. A higher level of safety assurance is achieved by comparing safety data between the receiver devices. In one embodiment, the signal received from the various transmitter devices is compared. The RFBIST circuit block eliminates the physical transmit antenna position properties to compare the transmitted signal properties after signal path elimination. Thus, the present invention is capable of (1) validating multiple transmitter devices with a single receiver device and (2) validating multiple receiver devices with a single transmitter device. When receiver devices detect a fault and that particular device is the master device, then a mechanism is provided to shut down the master device and making a slave device the new master device.