Vehicle Radar Single Point Scattering Center Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining whether a target object is a single point scattering center in vehicle-based radar systems are not robust enough due to high computational complexity and sensitivity issues, particularly in complex automotive environments.

Innovation Solution

A method using a vehicle-based radar system with a radar transmit element and multiple antenna receiver elements, where a radar signal is transmitted, reflected signals are frequency transformed to create a range-Doppler map, and a beam vector is processed through Fourier transforms to calculate a peak amplitude and compare it with a reference value, determining the extent to which the target object is a single point scattering center with low computational effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If cross-correlation method is used to determine single point scattering center, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary phase information from the radar signals rather than performing complete cross-correlation analysis. By focusing solely on phase differences between antenna elements, the method achieves single point scattering center detection without the full computational burden of traditional cross-correlation, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection process is segmented into independent phase difference calculations for each antenna element pair, rather than performing a unified cross-correlation operation. This segmentation allows parallel processing and reduces the overall computational complexity while preserving the accuracy needed to identify single point scattering centers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If traditional landmark determination approaches are used, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelandmark detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical signal processing operations (cross-correlation, template matching, gradient analysis) with a simpler phase-based detection mechanism. By substituting these computationally intensive methods with direct phase difference measurement and comparison, the system achieves landmark detection accuracy without the associated processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of analyzing the complete radar signal characteristics to determine landmarks, the patent inverts the approach by focusing on the phase relationships as the primary indicator. This inversion simplifies the detection process by considering only the phase component rather than analyzing the full signal structure, thereby reducing processing complexity while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If single-scan observation is used for landmark examination, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidlandmark determination robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple radar scans together to form a composite dataset for landmark determination. By combining information from multiple scans, the system improves reliability and robustness of landmark detection while maintaining relatively simple processing operations. The phase-based approach allows straightforward integration of multiple scans without requiring complex multi-scan processing algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method is robust and sensitive, capable of accurately identifying single point scattering centers with low computational complexity, improving reliability and reducing errors in self-localization and mapping processes.

Implementation Method 1

a radar signal is transmitted from the at least one radar transmit element to the target object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

reflected signals of the signal transmitted in step a) from the target object are received at the receiver elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

a frequency transformation of the reflected signals is performed as step c) in order to create a range-Doppler map

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler Effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11215693B2Method for testing a target object as single point scattering center
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11215693B2 patent drawing
  • US11215693B2 patent drawing
  • US11215693B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle-based method of determining the extent to which a target object is a single point scattering center is provided, wherein the vehicle comprises a radar system including at least one radar transmit element adapted to send a radar signal towards the target object, and a plurality of receiver channels (elements or antennas), each being adapted to receive radar signals reflected from the target object. According to the method, a radar signal is transmitted from the at least one radar transmit element to the target object, and signals being reflected by the target object are received at the receiver channels. A frequency transformation of the reflected signals is performed in order to create a range-Doppler map for each of the plurality of receiver channels. Furthermore, a beam vector is generated by selecting a respective value from each of the range-Doppler maps as an element of the beam vector corresponding to a respective receiver channel. The beam vector is processed by a Fourier transform and a peak amplitude from the Fourier transform is calculated. Finally, a reference value is calculated which depends on the elements of the beam vector, and the peak amplitude is compared with the reference value in order to determine the extent to which the target object is a single point scattering center.