Radar-Assisted Safety Sensor Muting for Hazard Zone Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing monitoring devices with light curtains for safety applications often fail to reliably distinguish between non-safety-critical and safety-critical objects, leading to potential safety risks as they can incorrectly mute the safety function when non-safety-critical objects are present, allowing safety-critical objects to pass undetected.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating radar sensors to differentiate between non-safety-critical and safety-critical objects by analyzing their movement patterns and spatial presence, ensuring that the safety function is only bypassed when only non-safety-critical objects are detected, thereby preventing dangerous situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If muting sensors are used to detect non-safety-critical objects, then productivity is improved by avoiding unnecessary safety function triggers, but reliability deteriorates because safety-critical objects may pass undetected when incorrectly muted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavoidance of unnecessary downtimeVSAvoidsafety detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent sensor units (first safety sensor, second safety sensor, and radar sensor) with distinct detection zones. This segmentation allows the radar sensor to specifically monitor for safety-critical objects while the safety sensors monitor all objects, enabling differentiated response based on object type without compromising overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The radar sensor acts as an intermediary between the safety sensors and the muting function. It provides additional verification information about detected objects, allowing the system to intelligently determine whether to activate the muting function. This intermediary layer prevents direct muting based solely on safety sensor signals, thereby maintaining safety while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the safety sensor muting function is activated for non-safety-critical objects, then ease of operation is improved by allowing continuous processing, but safety risk increases due to potential gaps in protective field monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous material flowVSAvoidunmonitored safety-critical object passage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The radar sensor performs preliminary detection and classification of objects before they reach the safety sensor's muting decision point. By identifying safety-critical objects in advance based on their characteristics (size, shape, movement pattern), the system can prevent inappropriate muting activation, ensuring continuous monitoring of safety-critical objects while allowing continuous processing of non-safety-critical objects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the radar sensor continuously monitors the detection zone and provides real-time information about object presence and characteristics. This feedback loop allows the control unit to dynamically adjust the muting function based on current conditions, maintaining both continuous operation for valid cases and safety monitoring for critical cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of radar sensors enhances the safety and reliability of monitoring devices by accurately distinguishing between object types, ensuring that safety-critical objects are not missed, thus preventing dangerous conditions and maintaining system safety.

Implementation Method 1

a radar sensor (9) arranged upstream of the safety sensor (5) by means of which a spatial area (10) of the access is monitored

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

at least one light curtain (5), which typically has a series arrangement of light beam emitting transmitters in a first housing and a series arrangement of light beam receiving receivers in a second housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight: Light

Data Source

PatentEP3885635B1Monitoring device for securing access to a danger zone with a safety sensor
Publication Date: 2024.03.13 LEUZE ELECTRONIC GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3885635B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3885635B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3885635B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a monitoring device (1) for securing access to a hazardous area, comprising a safety sensor designed to monitor a monitored area. Upon detection of an object by the safety sensor, a safety function can be triggered. A radar sensor (9) is arranged upstream of the safety sensor, by means of which a spatial area (10) of the access area is monitored. Non-safety-critical objects can be distinguished from safety-critical objects by means of the radar sensor (9). The safety function of the safety sensor is then overridden if only a non-safety-critical object is detected in the spatial area (10) by the radar sensor (9).