Radar Signal Processing Segmentation for Memory Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar systems for road safety and new-generation vehicles require large storage capacity for two-dimensional FFT processing, leading to memory constraints and data loss due to the need for extensive memory replication and delayed processing, which limits the ability to process data in real-time and affects accuracy and information resolution.

Innovation Solution

The radar system is divided into two processing sections: acquisition for initial target detection and tracking, using one-dimensional FFT processing to reduce memory requirements and enable real-time operation, allowing for approximate target location and subsequent precise tracking without extensive memory usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If two-dimensional FFT processing is used for target detection and tracking, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and memory requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget parameter determination accuracyVSAvoidmemory capacity and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the processing into two distinct sections: acquisition section performing one-dimensional FFT for initial target detection, and tracking section performing second one-dimensional FFT for precise parameter determination. This segmentation allows each section to use optimized processing appropriate to its function, reducing overall memory requirements while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically switches between different processing modes based on operational phase. During acquisition, only one-dimensional FFT is performed with minimal memory storage. During tracking, a second one-dimensional FFT is performed on selected targets. This dynamic approach adapts memory and processing requirements to actual operational needs rather than requiring maximum capacity continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If memory capacity is increased for two-dimensional FFT processing, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidmemory replication and system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the necessary data subsets at each stage. The acquisition section processes all incoming signals through one-dimensional FFT, then selects specific targets for tracking. The tracking section performs second FFT only on these selected targets, rather than processing all data through full two-dimensional FFT. This extraction approach maintains productivity for critical targets while dramatically reducing memory and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing complete one-dimensional FFT processing during acquisition, then performing a second one-dimensional FFT only on selected targets during tracking rather than on all data. This partial processing approach provides sufficient productivity for target detection and tracking while avoiding the excessive memory requirements of full two-dimensional FFT processing of all data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If real-time processing is implemented, then loss of time is reduced, but measurement precision may be compromised due to reduced processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing timeVSAvoidtarget parameter accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The acquisition section performs one-dimensional FFT processing on all incoming signals in real-time to detect target presence and obtain initial parameter estimates. This preliminary action identifies which targets require further processing, allowing the tracking section to focus computational resources on selected targets. This preliminary filtering maintains real-time capability while enabling precise measurement for critical targets through subsequent second FFT processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces memory and processing complexity, enabling real-time data processing and accurate determination of target parameters like range, speed, and azimuth, while preventing data loss and improving system accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

a radar system R mounted on board a vehicle V is able to detect, in addition to the presence and to the distance or range of possible obstacles, also further parameters such as, for example, the angular position (azimuth), the speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

The received signal RS may be mixed, according to a general heterodyne receiver scheme, with a (local) replica of the transmitted signal, so as to generate an intermediate-frequency signal IF

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeterodyne mixing: Heterodyne

Data Source

PatentUS9239379B2Method and devices for processing radar signals
Publication Date: 2016.01.19 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US9239379B2 patent drawing
  • US9239379B2 patent drawing
  • US9239379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for processing signals received by a plurality of receiving antennas in a radar system, for example for road safety, which emits sequences of chirp-modulated signals, wherein the received signals are mixed with local replicas of the transmitted signals so as to generate, for each receiving antenna, a sequence of detection signals. The detection signals are subjected to Fourier-transform processing and beam-forming processing for generating values of range, azimuth, and speed for at least one obstacle or “target” detected by the radar system. The method includes an acquisition process for yielding approximate values of range and azimuth of the obstacle, and a tracking process for yielding accurate range, azimuth and speed values of the obstacle itself.