Radar Transceiver Timing Engine for MIMO Chirp Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radar systems face challenges in achieving precise timing control for frequency chirps during data acquisition, as they rely on SPI communications, which are not suitable for precise timing and can introduce latency and disturbances, especially in MIMO radar systems where precise control is crucial for effective data acquisition.

Innovation Solution

A radar transceiver system with a timing engine that generates control signals for transmitters and receivers, coupled with a sweep control unit and a Phase Locked Loop (PLL) to precisely control chirp generation, reducing reliance on SPI communications and enhancing timing precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If SPI communications are used to control chirp generation, then the system can be controlled via a standard interface, but the timing precision deteriorates due to latency and communication overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveStandard interface controlVSAvoidTiming precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two parts: a host processor that sends high-level commands via SPI, and an integrated timing engine within the radar IC that handles precise real-time chirp generation. This segmentation allows the SPI interface to remain simple while the internal timing engine provides precise timing control without communication latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The timing engine acts as an intermediary between the SPI interface and the chirp generation process. It receives commands from the host via SPI and translates them into precisely timed control signals for the transmitters and receivers, eliminating the need for the host processor to directly manage timing-critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If SPI communications are used during data acquisition, then the system can be controlled externally, but the system reliability deteriorates due to supply voltage disturbances and communication interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveExternal control capabilityVSAvoidSystem stability during acquisition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The timing-critical control functions are extracted from the external SPI communication path and embedded within the radar IC's timing engine. This extraction ensures that supply voltage disturbances and communication interruptions on the SPI bus do not affect the stability of chirp generation and data acquisition operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The timing engine pre-configures and pre-loads all timing parameters and control sequences before data acquisition begins. This preliminary preparation allows the system to execute pre-planned timing sequences internally without requiring external interventions during the critical data acquisition phase, thereby maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If a large RX antenna array is used to achieve large aperture, then the angular resolution improves, but the physical size increases making placement difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAngular resolutionVSAvoidSensor physical size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple transmitting antennas with multiple receiving antennas in a MIMO configuration, where the effective aperture is the product of the number of TX and RX elements. This merging approach achieves the angular resolution of a large aperture system while keeping the physical footprint compact by reusing antenna elements for both transmission and reception across multiple channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-plane antenna array to a multi-dimensional MIMO configuration by adding the temporal dimension through sequential TX activation. This allows the system to achieve equivalent aperture performance to a physically larger array by utilizing multiple transmission channels and processing returns from different TX-RX combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Area of stationary object

If a dielectric lens is used with a small number of antenna elements, then the physical size is reduced, but the angular field-of-view is limited to +10 degrees

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSensor physical sizeVSAvoidAngular field-of-view
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple TX antennas with multiple RX antennas in a MIMO configuration, where each TX-RX pair provides a separate measurement channel. This combination allows the system to achieve a wide angular field-of-view by processing signals from multiple spatial perspectives, overcoming the limited field-of-view constraint of single-antenna lens systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds the temporal dimension to the spatial sampling by sequentially activating different TX antennas while RX antennas continuously sample. This temporal-multiplexed approach enables the system to synthesize a wide field-of-view by combining measurements from multiple TX positions, effectively creating a virtual large-aperture system with extended angular coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables precise and reliable data acquisition by directly controlling chirp generation, avoiding the limitations of SPI communications and ensuring accurate timing, which is essential for effective radar operation, particularly in MIMO systems.

Implementation Method 1

a controlled Phase Locked Loop (PLL) adapted to generate a local oscillator signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase Locked Loop:

Data Source

PatentUS9547071B2Radar transceiver
Publication Date: 2017.01.17 NXP BV
  • US9547071B2 patent drawing
  • US9547071B2 patent drawing
  • US9547071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radar transceiver is disclosed. The radar transceiver includes a computing unit, a sweep control unit, a set of transmitters for transmitting radar chirps to targets, a set of receivers for receiving reflected chirps from the targets, and a timing engine processor coupled to the set of transmitters and to the set of receivers and configured to transmit a first set of control signals. The timing engine processor receives a second set of control signals generated by the computing unit. The sweep control unit receives a first control signal and a second control signal from the timing engine processor. The first control signal indicating a start time of a chirp and the second control signal indicating a reset time for resetting the chirp. A controlled phased lock loop (PLL) generates a local oscillator signal which is inputted to transmitters and receivers.