Vehicle Radar Velocity and Acceleration Vector Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle radar systems face challenges in determining complete velocity and acceleration vectors for tracked objects in as few radar cycles as possible, while maintaining reliability and accuracy, especially in the presence of noise and outliers.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle radar system that selects specific detections for velocity and acceleration components, calculates radial velocities, determines errors, and identifies inliers within an error threshold, choosing the set of components that results in the largest number of inliers to group detections as an extended object, using methods like RANSAC to robustly estimate velocity and acceleration vectors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complete velocity and acceleration vectors are determined using traditional methods, then measurement precision is improved, but the number of radar cycles required increases and computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity and acceleration vector determination accuracyVSAvoidnumber of radar cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting only the necessary minimum number of detections (one for velocity components, one for acceleration components) rather than using all available detections. This selective approach allows complete vector determination in fewer radar cycles while maintaining measurement precision through targeted component selection and calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If complete velocity and acceleration vectors are determined using traditional methods, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity and acceleration vector determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the essential velocity and acceleration components from the detections rather than performing comprehensive processing on all detection data. By taking out only the necessary components (one detection for velocity, one for acceleration) and calculating their specific parameters, the system achieves accurate vector determination with reduced computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If all detections are processed to determine velocity vectors, then reliability is improved, but the number of radar cycles required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject tracking reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of radar cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-selecting the most informative detections for velocity and acceleration component extraction before performing full vector calculations. This preliminary selection of key detections (one for velocity, one for acceleration) ensures reliable object tracking while completing the process in fewer radar cycles by avoiding unnecessary processing of redundant detection data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves object tracking performance and ego dynamics estimation, maintaining robustness even with low detection numbers and noise, by utilizing multiple radar cycles and simplifying calculations to optimize velocity and acceleration components simultaneously.

Implementation Method 1

for each one of a plurality of radar cycles, provide a measured azimuth angle and a measured radial velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 2

the vehicle radar system includes a radar transceiver arranged for generating radar signals that are transmitted, reflected and received

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS11536830B2Determining object motion and acceleration vector in a vehicle radar system
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 QUALCOMM AUTO LTD
  • US11536830B2 patent drawing
  • US11536830B2 patent drawing
  • US11536830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle radar system (3) which, for each one of a plurality of radar cycles, is arranged to, provide a measured azimuth angle (θm) and radial velocity (vdm) for a first plurality of detections (9, 20). For each one of the plurality of radar cycles, the radar system (3) is arranged to select one of these detections for each one of two velocity components (vx, vy) in a set of components (vx, vy, ax, ay; a) to be determined; select one detection from a second plurality of detections (9, 20) for each one of at least one corresponding acceleration component (ax, ay; a); calculate the components (vx, vy, ax, ay; a) for the selected detections; determine a calculated radial velocity (vdc) for each one of at least a part of the other detections in the first plurality of detections (9, 20) using the calculated components (vx, vy, ax, ay; a); determine an error between each calculated and measured radial velocity (vdc, vdm); and determine the number of inliers. The set of components (vx, vy, ax, ay; a) that results in the largest number of inliers is then chosen.