Radar Waveform Processing for Real-Time Target Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar systems, particularly FMCW radar, rely on processor-intensive fast Fourier transforms (FFT) for spectral analysis, which limits data processing to position and speed, causing signal smearing and requiring batched data, leading to time-averaged frequency spectrum measurements.

Innovation Solution

A method that compares waveforms instead of spectra, using predicted waveforms to determine target parameters like position, velocity, acceleration, and size, allowing for real-time processing and flexible parameter representation, and is scalable to multiple receivers and transmitters, using Monte Carlo methods and particle filtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If spectral analysis using FFT is used to process radar signals, then position and speed of targets can be determined, but the processing becomes processor-intensive and requires batched data, causing time delays and memory bandwidth issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget position and speed determinationVSAvoiddata processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/mathematical FFT processing system with a biological neural network system. The neural network processes radar signals in parallel without requiring batched data, eliminating the processor-intensive nature of FFT while maintaining target detection accuracy. The neural network's distributed processing architecture naturally handles real-time signal analysis without memory bandwidth constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic, adaptive processing through neural networks that can adjust their processing characteristics in real-time based on signal conditions. Unlike static FFT algorithms that require fixed batch processing, the neural network dynamically adapts to incoming signals, enabling continuous real-time processing without time delays associated with batched data requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If FFT algorithms are used for spectral analysis, then frequency spectrum data can be obtained, but data must be batched into lengthy sequential chunks, resulting in time-averaged measurements rather than real-time data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency spectrum informationVSAvoidreal-time processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the sequential FFT computational approach with parallel neural network processing. The neural network receives and processes individual radar signals continuously without batching, preserving real-time information while maintaining frequency spectrum analysis capabilities through its distributed pattern recognition architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network enables continuous processing of radar signals without interruption for batching operations. Each incoming signal is processed immediately and continuously, eliminating the time-averaging effect of batched FFT processing and providing true real-time frequency spectrum information for target detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If FFT processing is applied to radar signals, then target position and speed can be estimated, but the algorithm requires wide area memory access in non-sequential manner, increasing memory bandwidth requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget parameter estimationVSAvoidmemory bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the memory-intensive FFT algorithm with a neural network architecture that processes signals through distributed weighted connections. This substitution eliminates the need for wide-area non-sequential memory access, as the neural network's parameters are stored in localized weight matrices that can be accessed efficiently during processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network divides the signal processing task into segmented operations across multiple layers and neurons, each processing local portions of the input signal. This segmentation allows for localized memory access patterns rather than the wide-area non-sequential access required by FFT, significantly reducing memory bandwidth requirements while maintaining processing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach eliminates the need for FFT, enabling immediate data processing, increased flexibility in parameter estimation, and improved accuracy, with reduced latency and memory access issues, allowing for more accurate and efficient detection of targets in radar systems.

Implementation Method 1

receiving the received radiation reflected from a target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP3335058B1Processing received radiation reflected from a target
Publication Date: 2022.05.11 ZF AUTOMOTIVE UK LTD
  • EP3335058B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3335058B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3335058B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

A method of and apparatus for processing received radiation (e.g. RADAR radiation) reflected from a target (101), the method comprising generating (200) a set of predicted targets, the set of predicted targets comprising at least one member, each member representing a state of the target (101), generating (201) a predicted waveform for the radiation for each member dependent upon the state of the target (101), and comparing (202) each predicted waveform with a waveform of the received radiation to determine the accuracy with which the state of the target (101) represented by the member for which the predicted waveform was generated matches an actual state of the target (101).