Radial Adsorber Flow Guiding Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radial adsorbers with multiple layers face design complexity and cost implications due to stress on mechanical screens and reduced residence time for fluid flow, leading to increased operational and manufacturing costs, especially when adding more layers.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a radial adsorber with a vessel having multiple layers of adsorbent material, utilizing flow guiding structures that allow for a combination of radial and axial flow paths, and includes a flow bypass prevention mechanism to mitigate settling effects, reducing the need for intermediate screens and enhancing layer efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple layers of adsorbent material are added to increase purification capacity, then adsorption performance is improved, but mechanical screen stress increases and residence time decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadsorption performanceVSAvoidmechanical screen stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes intermediate mechanical screens from the radial adsorber design, extracting the problematic component that caused stress and complexity. The adsorbent layers are held in place by the vessel walls and flow guiding structures rather than requiring additional screening layers, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining multiple adsorbent layers for high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from axial flow through multiple screens to radial flow between vessel walls, changing the dimensional approach to fluid flow and layer support. This radial configuration allows multiple layers to be maintained without the mechanical screen infrastructure required in axial designs, resolving the contradiction between layer count and mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple layers of adsorbent material are added to increase purification capacity, then adsorption performance is improved, but residence time for fluid flow is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadsorption performanceVSAvoidresidence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By changing from axial to radial flow direction, the patent extends the effective residence time as fluid travels circumferentially through multiple layers rather than passing quickly through stacked axial layers. The radial path allows fluid to interact with multiple adsorbent layers without compressing the time available for adsorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the flow path into multiple radial passages between vessel walls and flow guiding structures, allowing fluid to systematically progress through each adsorbent layer. This segmentation ensures adequate contact time with each layer while maintaining overall high purification capacity through the multi-layer configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If intermediate screens are used to support adsorbent layers, then layer stability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the intermediate screen component entirely from the design, eliminating the need for manufacturing, installing, and maintaining multiple screen layers. Layer stability is achieved through the vessel geometry and flow guiding structures rather than mechanical screens, significantly simplifying manufacturing while maintaining operational stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The vessel walls and flow guiding structures serve multiple functions: containing the adsorbent layers, directing fluid flow, and providing structural support without requiring separate screening components. This multi-functionality reduces manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining layer stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration allows for effective fluid treatment with reduced complexity and cost, maintaining efficient adsorption performance across multiple layers while minimizing bypass issues and operational downtime.

Implementation Method 1

a first layer of material (305) including a first material and a second layer of material (309) including a second material... configured to remove one or more target elements from a fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11596895B2Radial adsorber, adsorption system, and adsorption methods
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US11596895B2 patent drawing
  • US11596895B2 patent drawing
  • US11596895B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radial adsorber can be configured to facilitate utilization of different layers of material. The radial adsorber, system using at least one radial adsorber, and methods of utilizing embodiments of the radial adsorber can help permit improved efficient operation of fluid purification processing while also being configured to minimize, if not fully avoid, being susceptible to the effect of fluidization.