Radial Bearing Cage with Variable Thickness Bridges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radial cages for needle roller bearings experience deformation and increased friction at high rotational speeds due to centrifugal forces, leading to reduced service life and durability, and the risk of overrolling of needle rollers under axial loads.

Innovation Solution

A radial cage design with axially connected side rings and bridges, featuring varying material thickness in the side sections to secure rolling elements and prevent overrolling, along with an undercut pocket design to reduce friction and maintain lubricant film, ensuring secure guiding and reduced wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the axial bridges are designed with straight side sections to reduce cage distortion at high rotational speeds, then the cage stability is improved, but the bridges may break due to bending from centrifugal forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage stabilityVSAvoidbridge strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The axial bridges are designed with varying material thickness along their length, with the thickest section at the center and progressively thinner sections toward the ends. This non-uniform thickness distribution optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio, providing maximum strength where centrifugal forces are highest (center) while reducing mass at the ends to minimize bending moments, thereby resolving the contradiction between cage stability and bridge strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of moving object

If the installation height is reduced to achieve compact design, then the bearing size is reduced, but the needle rollers may be overrolled from the cage into the side rings under axial loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation heightVSAvoidroller retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The side sections of the axial bridges are designed with increased material thickness compared to conventional designs. This preliminary reinforcement creates a physical barrier that prevents needle rollers from being overrolled into the side rings under axial loads, thereby maintaining roller retention reliability even in the compact configuration with reduced installation height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Weight of moving object

If the bridges are made thinner to reduce mass and centrifugal forces, then the cage distortion is reduced, but the guiding of rolling elements deteriorates and friction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage massVSAvoidroller guiding
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The axial bridges feature a non-uniform thickness profile with the thickest section at the center and thinner sections toward the ends. This local quality variation provides sufficient mass at the center to maintain proper guiding of rolling elements and reduce friction, while the thinner end sections minimize overall cage mass and centrifugal forces, thereby resolving the contradiction between lightweight design and effective roller guiding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If the material thickness is increased to prevent bridge breaking, then the bridge strength is improved, but the centrifugal forces on the cage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebridge strengthVSAvoidcentrifugal force
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The axial bridges are designed with a non-uniform thickness distribution, concentrating the maximum material thickness at the center section where bending moments from centrifugal forces are highest. The thickness progressively decreases toward the end sections, reducing the overall mass and thus the total centrifugal forces acting on the cage, while still providing sufficient strength at the critical center region to prevent bridge breaking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances the guiding of rolling elements, prevents overrolling and jamming, and maintains a low-friction, lubricant-rich environment, thereby extending the service life and durability of the bearing under high dynamic loads.

Implementation Method 1

the radial cage is stressed by the intermittent extremely high centrifugal forces such that the axial bridges bend radially outward due to their own mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS9856915B2Radial cage for bearings having high rotational speeds
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US9856915B2 patent drawing
  • US9856915B2 patent drawing
  • US9856915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radial cage for receiving and guiding cylindrical rolling elements includes first and second axially spaced side rings and a plurality of axial bridges therebetween, the axial bridges defining a plurality of pockets for receiving the cylindrical rolling elements. Each of the plurality of axial bridges includes a first axial side section connected to the first side ring and a second axial side section connected to the second side ring and a center axial section, and the center axial section is connected to the first side section via a first oblique intermediate section and to the second side section via a second oblique intermediate section, and the first axial side section includes a first region having a first material thickness and a second region having a second material thickness greater than the first material thickness.