Radial Compressor Bypass Valve for Turbocharger Pressure Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing compressor bypass valves in two-stage turbochargers face issues with nonlinear bypass flow rate regulation, significant pressure drop, poor transient response, and unsteady state operation due to the spring's dual functions and parallel movement with respect to pressure gradients, leading to design limitations and high manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A rotating guillotine-style valve flap with a radially movable design perpendicular to the pressure gradient, actuated by a pneumatically or electrically controlled actuator, and featuring an umbrella valve for self-actuating safety, made from plastics to reduce weight and manufacturing complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a spring is used to maintain contact between the valve member and valve seat, then tightness is improved, but the closing response time becomes dependent on pressure differences and spring design becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetightnessVSAvoidclosing response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the spring from the valve actuation mechanism entirely. The valve member is directly actuated by pressure differential across the valve seat, with no spring involved. This eliminates the complexity of spring design and removes pressure dependency from closing response time, while maintaining tightness through the direct pressure-driven sealing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical spring system with a direct pressure-driven mechanism. The valve member is moved by the pressure differential between the compressor inlet and outlet, substituting the elastic mechanical system (spring) with a fluid pressure system that provides both actuation and sealing forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the valve member moves parallel to the pressure gradient, then sealing is achieved, but pressure drop and flow loss increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesealingVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the traditional valve geometry. Instead of a valve member moving parallel to the pressure gradient (poppet valve), the valve member moves perpendicular to the pressure gradient, like a guillotine blade cutting across the flow. This allows the valve to seal effectively while minimizing flow disturbance and pressure loss when open.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dimension of valve movement from axial (parallel to pressure gradient) to radial (perpendicular to pressure gradient). The valve member rotates about an axis perpendicular to the pressure gradient direction, creating a sealing surface that is circumferential rather than axial, thereby reducing flow resistance when open.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a metal valve is used, then durability is improved, but manufacturing cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from metal to plastic (specifically PTFE or similar fluoropolymer). This material substitution maintains durability through chemical inertness and wear resistance while significantly reducing manufacturing cost and weight. The plastic valve member is compatible with the pressure-driven actuation mechanism and provides adequate sealing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances response time, reduces pressure loss, and improves tightness and durability by minimizing pressure-dependent effort and impact stresses, while allowing for easier regulation and cost-effective production.

Implementation Method 1

valve flap which is radially movable with respect to said outlet between an opened position and a closed position... Movement of the valve flap is perpendicular to pressure gradients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

When the pressure difference is reversed, the safety function is achieved thanks to a dedicated device, i.e., an umbrella valve carried by the flap and is self-actuating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP2808514B1Compressor Bypass Valve
Publication Date: 2016.03.02 MANN HUMMEL GMBH
  • EP2808514B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2808514B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2808514B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention relates to a compressor bypass valve (1) for use in a multi-stage turbocharger of an internal combustion engine, said valve (1) comprising a valve body (30) comprising a compressor bypass passage (33, 42) having an inlet (33) and an outlet (42), and means for opening and closing said bypass passage (33, 42) comprising a valve flap (10). According to the invention, said valve flap (10) is radially movable with respect to said outlet (42) between an opened position and a closed position