Radial Exhaust Diffuser Asymmetric Support Poles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radial exhaust diffusers in gas turbine engines face pressure losses and frequent failures due to the use of poles and turning vanes, which are exacerbated in designs without turning vanes, leading to reduced aerodynamic performance and component lifetime.

Innovation Solution

The radial exhaust diffuser design features an inner barrel supported by a limited number of inclined support poles positioned only about the inner barrel's bottom half, which reduces flow blockages and mechanical stress by minimizing the number of poles and avoiding the six o'clock position, thereby enhancing both aerodynamic performance and structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If poles are used to support the inner barrel, then structural integrity is improved, but pressure losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidpressure losses
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes turning vanes from the design, extracting the component that was causing frequent failures and pressure losses. The inner barrel is supported by poles alone, eliminating the need for turning vanes that were attached to the poles, thereby reducing flow blockages and pressure losses while maintaining structural integrity through optimized pole positioning and inclination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If turning vanes are used with poles, then flow transition is improved, but component failures increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow transitionVSAvoidcomponent failures
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the turning vanes from the system entirely. The flow transition is achieved through the inclined poles themselves and the diffuser geometry, eliminating the turning vanes that were subject to frequent failures in the field due to harsh operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If poles are positioned circumferentially about the hub, then structural support is improved, but flow blockages increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidflow blockages
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning poles only about the inner barrel bottom half portion rather than circumferentially about the entire hub. This localized positioning provides structural support where needed (at the bottom where the inner barrel requires stabilization) while minimizing flow blockages in the upper flow regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetry by placing poles exclusively in the bottom half portion of the inner barrel, creating an asymmetric configuration that breaks the traditional circumferential symmetry. This asymmetric pole arrangement reduces flow blockages in the critical upper flow regions while maintaining necessary structural support at the bottom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Stability of the object's composition

If support poles are positioned at the six o'clock position, then structural stability is improved, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by distributing poles around the bottom half portion rather than concentrating them at the six o'clock position. This provides structural stability through distributed support while minimizing aerodynamic interference with the exhaust flow that would occur at the bottom dead center position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3249182B1Radial exhaust diffuser
Publication Date: 2020.08.19 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3249182B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3249182B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3249182B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The present application provides a radial exhaust diffuser (100) for a gas turbine engine (10). The radial diffuser (100) may include an outer barrel (120), an inner barrel (110) positioned within the outer barrel (120), and a number of support poles (130) supporting the inner barrel (110) within the outer barrel (120). The support poles (130) are positioned only about an inner barrel bottom half portion (140).