Radiance-Guided Material Extraction for Glossy 3D Scene Relighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional view synthesis techniques struggle to accurately render complex scenes with highly diffuse or glossy materials and surfaces, leading to visual inaccuracies under different lighting conditions.

Innovation Solution

A view synthesis model utilizing radiance guided material extraction, incorporating neural radiance fields and a Laplacian pyramid environment map structure, to isolate view-dependent and view-independent radiance effects, enabling accurate rendering of 3D scenes under varying lighting conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional view synthesis techniques are used, then the rendering process is simple and fast, but the rendering accuracy and visual fidelity are poor, especially for complex materials and surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the rendering process into distinct components: view-independent radiance determination, view-dependent radiance determination, and synthesized image generation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall rendering accuracy while managing system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension by separating radiance into view-independent and view-dependent components, which allows the system to handle complex materials and surfaces more accurately. This dimensional separation enables independent optimization of each radiance component, improving rendering fidelity for glossy and diffuse materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional rendering methods are used, then the processing speed is fast, but the ability to handle different lighting conditions is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting condition adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the rendering system adaptable to different lighting conditions through separate view-independent and view-dependent radiance components. This allows the system to dynamically adjust to various lighting scenarios while maintaining processing efficiency through the modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by independently determining view-independent radiance (material properties, geometry) and view-dependent radiance (lighting conditions, view angle). This parameter separation enables the system to adapt to different lighting conditions without sacrificing processing speed, as each parameter can be computed and cached independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If material properties are extracted from digital images, then the extraction process is simple, but the material properties are dependent on environmental lighting conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property accuracyVSAvoidextraction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts material properties independently from environmental lighting conditions by determining view-independent radiance separately from view-dependent radiance. This extraction process isolates intrinsic material properties (albedo, roughness, normal maps) from extrinsic lighting factors, improving material property accuracy while managing complexity through systematic separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by determining view-independent radiance (material properties and geometry) before determining view-dependent radiance (lighting effects). This preliminary extraction of material properties independent of lighting conditions allows for more reliable material representation, as the fundamental material characteristics are established before lighting variations are applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250329106A1Relightable Scene Reconstructions Using Radiance Guided Material Extraction
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 ADOBE INC
  • US20250329106A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329106A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329106A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for relightable scene reconstructions using radiance guided material extraction are described to accurately render 3D scenes under different lighting conditions and perspectives than original source images from which the scenes are constructed. In an example, a processing device is operable to receive a plurality of digital images that depict a scene from multiple perspectives, determine a view-independent radiance of the scene based on the plurality of digital images, and determine a view-dependent radiance of the scene based on the plurality of digital images. The processing device is further operable to determine a set of lighting conditions associated with an input perspective, generate a synthesized image having a reconstruction of the scene based on the set of lighting conditions using the view-independent radiance and the view-dependent radiance, and output the synthesized image.