Radiant Heater Support Member for Drop-Test Fracture Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiant electric heaters with temperature-responsive devices suffer from mechanical and vibration failures during transportation and operation, particularly due to the elongate rod-like component's susceptibility to fracture under inertial forces during drop tests and shock loading, which can cause damage to the heater and the glass-ceramic cooking surface.

Innovation Solution

A supporting member with a central hoop and angled foot is securely mounted within the dish-like support, allowing limited movement of the rod-like component to prevent damage, while being simple and economical to manufacture and install, using corrosion-resistant materials like stainless steel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the elongate rod-like component is secured in cantilevered manner without support, then the temperature-responsive device can function properly, but the free end deflects excessively during drop tests and shock loading, causing fracture or damage to the cooking surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional reliability of temperature-responsive deviceVSAvoidresistance to inertial forces during drop test
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting member is pre-installed at the free end of the rod-like component before the drop test occurs, providing advance structural reinforcement. The foot of the supporting member extends through an opening in the base to provide preliminary support that prevents excessive deflection during subsequent shock loading or drop tests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting member acts as a cushioning element that absorbs and distributes the shock forces before they can cause damage. By positioning the supporting member at the free end of the rod-like component, the design provides beforehand protection against the inertial forces generated during drop tests or when heavy pans are placed on the cooking surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Ease of manufacture

If a supporting member is mounted solely in the thermal insulation material, then installation is simple, but the supporting member is unreliable and can break loose during sudden impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of supporting member installationVSAvoidretention reliability during sudden impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting member combines multiple retention mechanisms: the foot extends through an opening in the base and is retained by the surrounding base structure, while the central portion with hoop is positioned within the insulation material. This merging of mechanical anchoring (through the base opening) with material embedding (in insulation) provides both simplicity of installation and high reliability during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The opening in the base acts as an intermediary structure that mediates between the supporting member and the base itself. The foot of the supporting member extends through this opening, creating a secure mechanical connection that prevents the supporting member from breaking loose during sudden impact, while still allowing for relatively simple installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If the supporting member is positioned between the insulation material and the cooking surface, then it provides support, but it stresses the cooking surface and potentially causes fracture during drop tests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport capability for rod-like componentVSAvoidstress on glass-ceramic cooking surface
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting member is extracted from the configuration that directly contacts the cooking surface. Instead of positioning the supporting member between the insulation and cooking surface, the design extends the foot through an opening in the base, allowing the supporting member to be retained by the base structure rather than stressing the glass-ceramic cooking surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The base of the heater acts as an intermediary structure that absorbs and distributes the stresses. By routing the foot of the supporting member through an opening in the base, the mechanical loads are transferred to the base structure rather than being directly applied to the cooking surface, preventing stress concentration that could cause glass-ceramic fracture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Area of stationary object

If the rod-like component is made elongate to extend across the heater, then temperature monitoring coverage is improved, but the component becomes more susceptible to fracture under inertial forces during transportation and operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature monitoring coverage areaVSAvoidresistance to fracture under inertial forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting member is pre-installed at the free end of the elongate rod-like component to provide advance structural reinforcement. This preliminary support allows the rod-like component to maintain its elongate configuration for comprehensive temperature monitoring coverage while being protected against fracture during transportation and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting member provides beforehand cushioning at the vulnerable free end of the elongate rod-like component. This cushioning effect absorbs the inertial forces during drop tests or shock loading, allowing the component to extend across the heater for improved temperature monitoring coverage without being overly susceptible to fracture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively resists sudden loads, preventing damage to the heater and cooking surface during mechanical shocks and drops, while being cost-effective and easy to implement, with minimal design modifications required.

Implementation Method 1

a base of the dish-like support is provided with a loop of material extending internally of the dish-like support so as to provide an opening between the base of the dish-like support and the loop, the foot of the supporting member being received through the opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

the supporting member comprises a central portion with a hoop at a first end to receive the free end of the rod-like component and a foot at a second end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 3

the foot being bent at an angle relative to the central portion... effectively resists sudden loads, preventing damage to the heater and cooking surface during mechanical shocks and drops

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce distribution: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11448402B2Radiant electric heater
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 EIKA S COOP LTDA
  • US11448402B2 patent drawing
  • US11448402B2 patent drawing
  • US11448402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiant electric heater having a dish-like support having a base layer of thermal insulation material. At least one heating element is supported relative to the base layer. A temperature-responsive device having a rod-like component is secured at one end at a peripheral region of the dish-like support and extends without support partly across the heater over the at least one heating element. A supporting member is provided at a free end region of the rod-like component. The supporting member comprises a central portion with a hoop at a first end to receive the free end of the rod-like component and a foot at a second end, the foot being bent at an angle relative to the central portion. A base of the dish-like support is provided with a loop of material extending internally of the dish-like support so as to provide an opening between the base of the dish-like support and the loop, the foot of the supporting member being received through the opening.