Radiation Detector Array with Non-Coplanar Scintillators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional indirect conversion detector arrays in radiation systems face challenges in optimizing scintillator thickness to balance photon detection efficiency and minimize cross-talk between adjacent detector cells, leading to suboptimal image quality and attenuation measurement accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The proposed detector array incorporates a first and second detector cell with scintillators, where the second detection surface is substantially parallel but not coplanar with the first, allowing for a longer effective scintillator thickness and improved light energy conversion using solar cells, enhancing photon detection and reducing cross-talk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the scintillator thickness is increased to improve photon detection efficiency, then more radiation photons are detected, but cross-talk between adjacent detector cells increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephoton detection efficiencyVSAvoidcross-talk between adjacent detector cells
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a non-coplanar geometric arrangement where the second detection surface is substantially parallel but not coplanar with the first detection surface. This spatial configuration in three dimensions allows the scintillator to have an extended effective thickness along the radiation photon path while maintaining physical separation between adjacent detector cells, thereby reducing cross-talk. The slanted or angled positioning of detection surfaces creates additional path length for radiation photons through the scintillator without increasing the physical thickness in the direction perpendicular to the detector plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different geometric configurations to different parts of the detector array. Specifically, adjacent detector cells have detection surfaces that are substantially parallel but not coplanar, creating localized variations in the scintillator thickness along the radiation path. This allows each detector cell to have optimized local scintillator thickness for photon detection while the non-coplanar arrangement ensures that the effective thickness does not uniformly increase across all cells, thus minimizing cross-talk between adjacent cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the scintillator thickness is decreased to reduce cross-talk, then cross-talk between adjacent detector cells is minimized, but photon detection efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-talk between adjacent detector cellsVSAvoidphoton detection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The non-coplanar arrangement of detection surfaces enables the system to achieve increased effective scintillator thickness in the direction of radiation photon travel without proportionally increasing the physical thickness that would cause cross-talk. By angling or slanting the detection surfaces relative to each other while maintaining parallelism, the patent creates an extended interaction path for radiation photons through the scintillator material, improving detection efficiency while keeping the perpendicular thickness limited to reduce cross-talk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric geometric positioning where the second detection surface is parallel to but not coplanar with the first detection surface. This asymmetric arrangement creates different path lengths for radiation photons traversing adjacent detector cells, allowing optimization of photon detection in each cell while maintaining sufficient separation to minimize cross-talk. The asymmetric slant or angle introduces variation in the effective thickness that benefits detection efficiency without uniformly increasing cross-talk risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the detection of radiation photons by increasing the effective scintillator thickness, improving the conversion of light energy into electrical energy, and thereby improving the accuracy of attenuation measurements and image quality in radiation imaging systems.

Implementation Method 1

a first scintillator configured to convert a radiation photon impinging the first scintillator into first light energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

a first solar cell configured to convert the first light energy into first electrical energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10527738B2Radiation detector array with solar cell
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 ANALOGIC CORP
  • US10527738B2 patent drawing
  • US10527738B2 patent drawing
  • US10527738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detector array (118) for a radiation system includes first and second detector cells (202, 250). The first detector cell (202) includes a first scintillator (220) that converts a radiation photon (226) impinging the first scintillator (220) into first light energy (230), and a first solar cell (212) that converts the first light energy (230) into first electrical energy. The second detector cell (250) includes a second scintillator (270) that converts a radiation photon (276) impinging the second scintillator (270) into second light energy (280). The first scintillator (220) includes a first detection surface (224) through which the radiation photon (226) impinging the first scintillator (220) enters the first scintillator (220). The second scintillator (270) includes a second detection surface (274) through which the radiation photon (276) impinging the second scintillator (270) enters the second scintillator (270). The second detection surface (274) is substantially parallel to the first detection surface (224) and the second detection surface (274) is not coplanar with the first detection surface (224).