Radiation Detector Automatic Exposure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiation detectors face challenges in maintaining consistent image quality and reducing radiation dose variations across different object sizes, particularly in medical radiography, due to inadequate automatic exposure control mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine radiation doses received by a subset of pixels in a radiation detector, adjust exposure based on statistical criteria, and form images using another set of pixels, where the first set is distributed among chips, and a processor controls the radiation source to stop emission when certain dose criteria are met, ensuring consistent exposure and image formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a physically thin radiation ionization chamber is used as AEC device, then radiation exposure can be adjusted, but image quality consistency and radiation dose control for different object sizes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic exposure controlVSAvoidimage quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detector array is divided into multiple independently controllable detector elements arranged in columns. Each column can be independently activated or deactivated based on the size and attenuation characteristics of the object being imaged. This segmentation allows the system to adapt exposure parameters to different object sizes while maintaining consistent image quality across varying anatomical cross-sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active detector columns based on real-time assessment of object attenuation properties. By varying the active detector configuration during exposure, the system optimizes radiation dose delivery and image quality for each specific imaging scenario, rather than using fixed exposure parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If radiation exposure is increased to ensure adequate signal for all object sizes, then image quality improves, but radiation dose variation across different sized objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidradiation dose variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the detector array are selectively activated based on the local attenuation requirements imposed by the object being imaged. Objects with higher attenuation in certain regions trigger activation of corresponding detector columns, while regions with lower attenuation use fewer active detectors. This local adaptation ensures adequate signal quality where needed while minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (number of active detector columns) based on the measured attenuation characteristics of different object sizes. By dynamically adjusting this parameter, the system optimizes the balance between signal quality and radiation dose for each specific imaging scenario, reducing dose variation across different patient sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If a subset of pixels is used for exposure control, then automatic exposure adjustment is achieved, but the complexity of pixel distribution and dose calculation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic exposure controlVSAvoidpixel distribution management
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detector array is organized into discrete columns that can be independently controlled. This column-based segmentation simplifies the management of pixel subsets by providing a natural hierarchical structure - instead of managing individual pixels, the system manages columns of pixels as unified units. This reduces the computational complexity of dose calculation and control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The same detector elements serve dual purposes: they function as both imaging pixels and exposure control pixels. By using detector columns for both image formation and exposure monitoring, the system eliminates the need for separate dedicated control sensors, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining automated exposure control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces radiation dose variations and maintains consistent image quality by automatically adjusting exposure based on statistical characteristics of radiation doses, enhancing the precision and reliability of radiation detection systems.

Implementation Method 1

a radiation detector of this type may have a semiconductor layer that absorbs the radiation and generate charge carriers (e.g., electrons and holes) and circuitry for detecting the charge carriers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

AEC device (e.g., a physically thin radiation ionization chamber) may be positioned between a radiation source (e.g., X-ray source) and a radiation detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP3852632B1A radiation detector with automatic exposure control and a method of automatic exposure control
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 SHENZHEN XPECTVISION TECH CO LTD
  • EP3852632B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3852632B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3852632B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method comprising: determining doses of radiation received by a first set of pixels of a radiation detector; determining that the doses satisfy a criterion; adjusting exposure of the radiation detector to the radiation in response to the doses satisfying the criterion; and forming an image based on radiation received by a second set of pixels of the radiation detector.