Real-Time Radiation Exposure Tracking System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring and managing exposure to ionizing radiation during interventions are inefficient, as they do not allow for real-time, spatial, and temporal tracking of exposure levels, leading to unnecessary exposure of personnel and suboptimal resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves acquiring initial exposure mapping, processing data from individual and fixed detectors, and updating exposure information regularly to provide a real-time, spatial, and temporal overview of exposure conditions, allowing for optimized resource management and task planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predictive dosimetric assessment is used with initial maps created before work begins, then personnel can be protected from excessive radiation exposure, but the maps become outdated and require work stoppages to update measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure assessment accuracyVSAvoidwork stoppage time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects radiation measurement data from multiple detectors positioned throughout the work area without interrupting operations. This continuous data collection maintains up-to-date exposure information while allowing work to proceed uninterrupted, resolving the contradiction between maintaining accurate exposure maps and avoiding work stoppages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple detectors are pre-deployed throughout the work area before operations begin. This preliminary positioning of measurement devices enables continuous monitoring without requiring later interruptions to update the exposure map, as the measurement infrastructure is already in place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If actual exposure is determined retrospectively using individual dosimeters, then safety margins can be applied, but optimal resource utilization cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure measurement accuracyVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback on actual radiation exposure levels to supervisors and workers. This immediate feedback enables dynamic adjustment of work assignments and exposure management, allowing optimal utilization of personnel resources while maintaining safety, rather than waiting for retrospective dosimeter readings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Individual dosimeters continuously self-record exposure data and automatically transmit this information to the central system. This eliminates the need for manual data collection and enables real-time exposure tracking, allowing supervisors to optimize resource allocation based on actual exposure patterns as they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If passive monitoring of operator exposure is used, then exposure levels are recorded, but real-time control and management of dose received cannot be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure data collectionVSAvoidreal-time exposure management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously transmitting exposure data from individual dosimeters and fixed detectors to a central supervisory system. This enables supervisors to monitor and control operator exposure in real-time, making immediate adjustments to work assignments or protective measures as needed, rather than relying on passive post-exposure analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A central supervisory system acts as an intermediary between individual dosimeters and exposure management decisions. This intermediary collects, processes, and disseminates exposure information in real-time, enabling coordinated control of operator exposure across the entire work area without requiring direct intervention at each measurement point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If safety margins are applied to exposure limits, then personnel safety is ensured, but unnecessary exposure occurs when operators could be relocated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonnel safetyVSAvoidunnecessary radiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts exposure management based on real-time conditions. Instead of applying fixed safety margins that result in unnecessary exposure, the system continuously monitors actual exposure levels and enables dynamic relocation of operators or adjustment of work assignments based on current radiation conditions, minimizing exposure while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes exposure parameters in real-time based on measured radiation levels and operator locations. By continuously updating exposure assignments and relocation decisions based on current conditions rather than static safety margins, the system reduces unnecessary exposure while maintaining adequate safety protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3155455B1Method and device for the spatial and temporal tracking of exposure to risks
Publication Date: 2020.05.27 CONSEILS & ETUD & RADIOPROTECTION
  • EP3155455B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3155455B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3155455B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a system for the supervision of an operator (150) intervening in an environment (100) which is exposed, in particular to ionizing radiations, characterized in that it comprises: a. a supervision centre (160) comprising a processor (161), memory means, display means (162) and means of access to a network; b. a detector (151), in particular a radiometer, tied to the operator, able to obtain a measurement of the intensity of the exposure, and comprising means for addressing said measurement in the network bound for the supervision centre (160); c. a map of the exposed environment, recorded in the memory means and comprising a mapping (211) of the intensity of exposure; d. means (130) of geolocation of the detector, comprising in particular a radiofrequency tag, tied to said detector; e. a so-called history file (231) recorded in the memory means and comprising a recording of this measurement, of the date of this measurement and of the location of the detector corresponding to this measurement; f. a linking terminal (152), connected to the network, and at the disposal of the operator (150); g. a so-called planning file (221) recorded in the memory means and comprising the list, the duration, the location and scheduling of the operator's tasks.