Radiation Image Processing Apparatus Frequency Band Decomposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing techniques for radiation images do not effectively enhance frequency components according to the object composition or user preference, often resulting in unsuitable images with noise or insufficient contrast.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that decomposes input image data into band-limited signals, selects preset data with frequency-response tables to perform nonlinear conversions, and reconstructs enhanced images by adding the converted signals to the original data, allowing for customizable frequency enhancement based on object composition or user preference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If frequency enhancement is applied to radiation images, then image contrast and interpretability are improved, but noise and artifacts are also enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage contrastVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing is segmented into multiple frequency bands using wavelet transformation. Different enhancement strategies are applied to different frequency components: high-frequency components (containing edge information) are enhanced with caution to avoid noise amplification, while low-frequency components (containing overall structure) are enhanced more aggressively. This segmentation allows selective noise suppression while maintaining contrast enhancement benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The enhancement process applies different processing characteristics to different regions of the image based on local properties. In regions with high signal-to-noise ratio, stronger enhancement is applied. In regions with low signal-to-noise ratio or near edges, enhancement is moderated to prevent artifact generation. This local adaptation resolves the contradiction by making enhancement quality spatially variable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If strong frequency enhancement is applied, then image interpretability improves, but artifacts near edges are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage interpretabilityVSAvoidartifact generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The enhancement coefficient is made dynamic rather than fixed. It varies based on local image characteristics such as gradient magnitude, noise level, and frequency content. This dynamic adjustment allows strong enhancement where it improves interpretability without generating artifacts, and reduces enhancement where artifacts would compromise reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The processing incorporates feedback mechanisms where the output of one processing stage informs subsequent stages. Artifact detection algorithms monitor the enhanced image and feed back to adjust enhancement parameters in real-time, suppressing enhancement in regions where artifacts are detected while maintaining enhancement in clean regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If frequency enhancement is applied uniformly, then processing simplicity is maintained, but results do not match object composition or user preference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to object composition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The processing system is designed with multi-functionality to handle different object types and user preferences. Multiple preset enhancement profiles are provided (e.g., bone-enhanced, soft-tissue enhanced, edge-enhanced) that can be selected based on the imaging application. The underlying algorithm remains universal, but its parameters are adapted to different requirements, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10572981B2Radiation image processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US10572981B2 patent drawing
  • US10572981B2 patent drawing
  • US10572981B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes the following. A hardware processor decomposes a signal value of input image data into band-limited signals having different frequency bands from each other. A storage stores pieces of preset data. Each of the pieces of preset data comprises tables to associate frequency with a response and to prescribe different response properties from each other. The hardware processor selects a piece of preset data from the pieces of preset data stored in the storage, converts the decomposed band-limited signals on a basis of tables in the selected piece of preset data, reconstructs the converted band-limited signals into enhanced image data, and generates a frequency-enhanced image through addition of the enhanced image data which is multiplied by a predetermined enhancement coefficient to the input image data.