Radiation Therapy Goal Prioritization Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radiation therapy treatment plans often lack clear prioritization of clinical goals, making it difficult for prescribing users to understand dosing trade-offs and optimize plans effectively, as they rely on general understanding rather than specific technical details.

Innovation Solution

A user interface and control circuit system that allows prescribing users to establish and dynamically change the relative priority of radiation-treatment clinical goals, generating and saving corresponding fluence-based radiation dose distributions, and visualizing dosing trade-offs, using predefined rules to determine optimized treatment plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If optimization objectives are specifically designed to reflect technical details and platform specifications, then manufacturing precision and measurement precision are improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate because these details are outside the expertise of prescribing users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose distribution precisionVSAvoidoptimization objective complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that translates between clinical goals (prescribed by users) and optimization objectives (technical parameters). The system automatically generates optimization objectives from user-defined clinical goals, serving as a mediator that bridges the gap between user expertise and technical complexity without requiring users to directly handle complex technical parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing prescribing users to define their own optimization objectives through simple clinical goals without needing to understand the underlying technical complexity. The system automatically handles the complex task of translating clinical intentions into precise optimization parameters, making the complex system usable by non-experts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple radiation-treatment clinical goals are established with relative priority, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates because users lack understanding of dosing trade-offs corresponding to prioritization choices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical goals prioritizationVSAvoidprioritization decision-making
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by displaying predicted dose distributions to users based on their prioritization choices. This allows users to see the actual dosing trade-offs resulting from different priority assignments, enabling informed decision-making. The system provides visual feedback showing how changing priorities affects dose delivery to target volumes and organs at risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically calculating and displaying predicted dose distributions for different prioritization scenarios before the user finalizes their choices. This allows users to preview the consequences of different priority assignments and make informed decisions without having to manually compute or understand complex dosing trade-offs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11964169B2Apparatus and method for forming prescribed radiation therapy treatment instructions
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
  • US11964169B2 patent drawing
  • US11964169B2 patent drawing
  • US11964169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A prescribing user can designate and prioritize clinical goals that can, in turn, serve as the basis for optimization objectives to guide the development of a radiation treatment plan. The prescribing user can then alter that prioritization of one or more clinical goals and view information regarding changes to fluence-based dose distributions that occur in response to those changes to relative prioritization amongst the clinical goals to thereby understand dosing tradeoffs that correspond to prioritization amongst the clinical goals.