Radiation Treatment Plan Optimization via Leaf Pair Smoothing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiation-therapy treatment plans are computationally intensive and costly due to the need for expensive processing platforms and time, which can lead to delays and unwanted costs, while they often fail to discriminate effectively between target volumes and adjacent tissues, necessitating careful administration of radiation.

Innovation Solution

A control circuit optimizes radiation-treatment plans by identifying the multi-leaf collimator leaf pair that requires the longest time to move into position and selectively smoothing their position requirements, while imposing a stronger smoothing constraint on fluence to reduce monitor units, allowing for flexible assessment of MU delivery without sacrificing therapeutic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If typical optimization processes are used to improve treatment plans, then therapeutic performance is improved, but computational cost and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic performanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process is segmented into two distinct stages: a rapid initial optimization that provides a baseline treatment plan, followed by a targeted refinement stage that focuses computational resources only on specific leaf pairs identified as requiring adjustment. This segmentation allows the system to achieve therapeutic performance while significantly reducing overall processing time by avoiding exhaustive optimization of all parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying uniform optimization across all leaf pairs, the system identifies specific leaf pairs with the longest movement times and applies enhanced smoothing constraints only to those local regions. This local quality approach concentrates computational effort where it is most needed, improving therapeutic performance for critical areas without proportionally increasing overall computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If typical optimization processes are used to improve treatment plans, then therapeutic performance is improved, but processing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic performanceVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the optimization into rapid initial optimization and targeted refinement stages, the system reduces the total computational workload required. The segmentation allows the system to achieve acceptable therapeutic performance with significantly lower processing costs by avoiding the need for expensive high-performance computing platforms throughout the entire optimization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies enhanced computational resources only to specific leaf pairs that require refinement, rather than uniformly optimizing all leaf pairs. This local quality approach reduces the total processing cost by concentrating computational effort only where necessary to achieve therapeutic performance, rather than expending resources across the entire treatment plan optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If radiation is applied to target volume, then tumor treatment is achieved, but adjacent tissues and organs receive unwanted radiation exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor treatment efficacyVSAvoidradiation exposure to adjacent tissues
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the fluence distribution by applying stronger smoothing constraints specifically to leaf pairs with the longest movement times, which are the ones contributing most to radiation exposure of adjacent tissues. This local quality optimization allows the system to reduce harmful radiation exposure to adjacent tissues while maintaining adequate tumor treatment efficacy by focusing adjustments where they have the greatest impact on dose distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8961382B2Method and apparatus pertaining to radiation-treatment plan optimization
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
  • US8961382B2 patent drawing
  • US8961382B2 patent drawing
  • US8961382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control circuit optimizes a radiation-treatment plan to provide an initially-optimized radiation-treatment plan and then modifies that initially-optimized radiation-treatment plan to reduce corresponding monitor units (MU's) to provide a radiation-treatment plan that is further optimized for monitor units. This modification can comprise, at least in part, imposing a stronger smoothing constraint with respect to fluence. Optimizing a radiation-treatment plan to provide an initially-optimized radiation-treatment plan can comprise identifying at least one particular leaf pair for a multi-leaf collimator that requires a longest amount of time to move into a position that achieves a particular desired fluence and then selectively smoothing position requirements of that particular leaf pair to reduce the amount of time associated with that particular leaf pair while not also smoothing position requirements for all leaf pairs as comprise that multi-leaf collimator.