Radiation Treatment Planning Software Automates Inverse Plan Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current inverse planning systems in radiation treatment require manual adjustment of optimization constraints, which is time-consuming and inefficient, as they lack automated methods to derive optimal beam weights and dosages for achieving homogeneous and conformal radiation distribution.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a treatment planning software that automatically modifies optimization constraints using a library of accepted treatment plans to optimize beam weights and dosages, ensuring conformality and homogeneity by referencing DVH profiles from previous successful treatments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of optimization constraints is used in inverse planning systems, then treatment plans can be customized to patient-specific needs, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization to patient-specific needsVSAvoidtime required for manual adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically deriving optimization constraints from historical treatment plans before the actual treatment planning process. Historical DVH data is pre-processed to generate constraint ranges and profiles that guide subsequent automatic plan generation, eliminating the need for manual constraint adjustment while maintaining patient-specific customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment planning system performs self-service by automatically generating optimization constraints and beam weight assignments without requiring manual intervention. The system uses historical data and automated algorithms to independently derive the optimal treatment parameters, reducing time loss while maintaining adaptability to individual patient needs through automated patient-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated methods are implemented to derive optimal beam weights and dosages, then treatment plan generation becomes more efficient, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of treatment plan generationVSAvoidsystem complexity for automated constraint derivation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses copying by referencing and adapting historical treatment plans and DVH profiles to generate new optimization constraints. Instead of creating entirely new algorithms, the system copies successful constraint patterns from historical data and applies them to current treatment scenarios, achieving automation while keeping system complexity manageable through data-driven reuse of proven approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity through parameter changes by transforming historical DVH data into optimized constraint parameters automatically. The system changes parameters such as beam weights, dose ranges, and constraint thresholds based on historical performance data, enabling efficient automated planning without requiring complex manual configuration of each parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If historical integration of previously accepted plans is used, then optimization accuracy improves, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of dose distributionVSAvoidamount of historical data to process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies extraction by selectively extracting relevant optimization constraints and DVH profiles from historical treatment plans. Instead of processing all historical data, the system extracts only the pertinent information (constraint ranges, dose profiles, beam weight assignments) that are relevant to the current treatment scenario, achieving high accuracy while reducing data processing requirements through selective data utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements local quality by tailoring the application of historical data to specific local characteristics of each patient case. The system analyzes the local anatomical features and treatment requirements to selectively apply relevant historical constraints and DVH profiles, ensuring high optimization accuracy for each specific case while avoiding unnecessary processing of irrelevant historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7362848B2Method for automatic anatomy-specific treatment planning protocols based on historical integration of previously accepted plans
Publication Date: 2008.04.22 ACCURAY LLC
  • US7362848B2 patent drawing
  • US7362848B2 patent drawing
  • US7362848B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of automatically optimizing an inverse treatment plan by referencing data from accepted plan libraries.