Radiation Welding Dissimilar Metals Preventing Intermetallic Phases

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The formation of intermetallic phases during the welding of metals with different melting temperatures leads to the creation of hard and brittle regions, reducing the strength of the joining zone.

Innovation Solution

Preventing the melting of the metal with the higher melting temperature in the joining zone by carefully controlling the radiation energy parameters, such as power and duration, and applying coatings to enhance bonding properties between the metals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If radiation energy is applied to melt both joining partners in the joining zone, then strong bonding is achieved, but intermetallic phases form that reduce strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidjoining zone strength
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The radiation energy is applied with local quality by targeting only the joining partner with lower melting temperature in the joining zone, while the joining partner with higher melting temperature remains unmelted. This selective melting approach creates a gradient where only the necessary material undergoes phase change, preventing intermetallic phase formation while maintaining bonding strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies parameter changes by precisely controlling radiation energy parameters (power, duration, focal position) to melt only the joining partner with lower melting temperature. By adjusting these parameters, the process achieves complete melting of the lower melting temperature material while keeping the higher melting temperature material solid, thus avoiding intermetallic phase formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If radiation power is increased to ensure complete melting of the lower melting temperature metal, then bonding is improved, but the higher melting temperature metal begins to melt and form intermetallic phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelting control precisionVSAvoidintermetallic phase formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements feedback control by monitoring the melting state of both joining partners and adjusting radiation energy parameters in real-time. This ensures that the lower melting temperature material is completely melted while the higher melting temperature material remains solid, preventing intermetallic phase formation through continuous process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies partial action by providing just enough radiation energy to melt the lower melting temperature joining partner completely, without exceeding the threshold that would cause melting of the higher melting temperature material. This precise energy dosing achieves the necessary bonding while avoiding harmful intermetallic phase formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach prevents the formation of intermetallic phases, resulting in a stronger and more reliable connection between metals with different melting temperatures, improving the quality of the joining process.

Implementation Method 1

the radiation energy exclusively has the effect of melting the joining partner having the lower melting temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation energy conversion to thermal energy: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

by the selection of corresponding parameters (radiation power, distance of applying the radiation energy to the joining zone, duration of irradiation, etc.) the melting in the joining zone of the joining partner having the higher melting temperature is prevented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS9452490B2Method for connecting different types of metallic joining partners using a radiation source
Publication Date: 2016.09.27 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9452490B2 patent drawing
  • US9452490B2 patent drawing
  • US9452490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for connecting different types of metallic joining partners using a radiation source, the two joining partners, having a different melting temperature, at least indirectly making contact lying against each other in the region of a joining zone, and the radiation source introducing its radiation energy into the one joining partner in a region next to the joining zone. It is provided that, because of the radiation source in the joining zone only the joining partner having a lower melting temperature is melted.