Radio Channel Coordination for Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face interference issues between licensed and unlicensed bands, such as 2.3 GHz and 2.4 GHz bands, leading to signal quality loss and data loss, with current solutions like robust modulation or filtering either reducing system capacity or increasing costs, and existing interference mitigation schemes causing widespread disruption.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for coordinating the use of a radio channel between Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) and IEEE 802.11 communication radios, involving a controller module that sends notifications to compute and transmit channel clear messages based on Received Signal Strength Indication, allowing interfering radios to halt activity and avoid interference, using Clear to Send Frame (CTS) Network Allocation Vector (NAV) parameters and pre-defined signal strength levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If robust modulation or coding scheme is used for licensed bands, then interference is reduced, but system capacity drops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidsystem capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the licensed radio (e.g., BWA) send a notification message to unlicensed radios (e.g., Wi-Fi) before transmitting. This advance notification allows unlicensed radios to clear the channel or adjust their transmission, preventing interference before it occurs. This approach maintains high-capacity modulation schemes while ensuring signal quality through proactive coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where unlicensed radios send acknowledgment messages back to the licensed radio after receiving notifications. This feedback loop ensures that the licensed radio can verify whether the channel is clear before proceeding with high-capacity transmissions, thereby maintaining both system capacity and signal quality through coordinated communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If filters are added to filter out interfering signals, then interference is reduced, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical filtering mechanisms (hardware filters) with a communication-based coordination system. Instead of using complex and expensive RF filters to separate licensed and unlicensed band signals, the system uses software-controlled notification and acknowledgment messages to coordinate channel usage. This substitution reduces device complexity and cost while maintaining signal quality through intelligent resource management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If control signal is transmitted over the air to make interfering radio back off, then interference is reduced, but non-interfering network communications are disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidnetwork disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the interference mitigation mechanism targeted and selective. The notification message is specifically addressed to the interfering unlicensed radio based on its identification, and the back-off requirement is localized only to that specific radio during the notification period. Other non-interfering networks continue their operations without disruption, as the coordination is confined to the specific licensed-unlicensed radio pair involved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If time division multiplexing is used for communication signals, then interference is reduced, but communication flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidcommunication flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the time division multiplexing arrangement flexible and adaptive rather than rigid. The notification message specifies a notification period during which the unlicensed radio should clear the channel, but this arrangement can be dynamically adjusted based on actual channel conditions, traffic requirements, and negotiation between radios. This allows the system to maintain signal quality through coordinated timing while preserving communication flexibility through adaptive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8725078B2Approach for enabling coexistence for radio technologies
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 TTSL IITB CENT FOR EXCELLENCE & TELECOM TICET
  • US8725078B2 patent drawing
  • US8725078B2 patent drawing
  • US8725078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosed herein relate to wireless communications, and more particularly to reducing interference in wireless communications. The principal object of this invention is to co-ordinate between two or more communication radios, present within the same device or a plurality of devices present close to each other, without interfering with other non-interfering devices. Embodiments disclosed herein disclose a scheme for reducing interference between any licensed and/or unlicensed radio.