Radio Node Diversity Mode Selection for Low Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radio networks face challenges in meeting the stringent requirements of low latency and high reliability, particularly in critical Machine-to-Machine (MTC) communications, where existing techniques often result in wasted resources and interference due to ineffective data transmission methods.

Innovation Solution

A method where a first radio node selects a diversity mode (time, frequency, or spatial) for transmitting data blocks based on estimated signal quality and round trip time thresholds, allowing autonomous retransmissions without feedback signaling, enabling efficient data transmission and reception.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional data transmission methods are used in radio networks, then basic communication functionality is maintained, but latency increases and reliability decreases due to feedback signaling requirements and ineffective retransmission handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitting radio node autonomously selects a diversity mode and performs retransmissions in advance without waiting for feedback signaling. The node estimates signal quality and round trip time, then proactively transmits redundant data blocks using selected diversity modes (time, frequency, or spatial) before the receiver could potentially request retransmission, thereby reducing latency while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The transmitting radio node independently determines whether retransmission is needed by monitoring estimated signal quality and round trip time metrics. Instead of relying on feedback from the receiving node, the transmitting node self-manages the retransmission process by autonomously selecting appropriate diversity modes and executing retransmissions when thresholds are exceeded, eliminating feedback signaling dependency and reducing latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If diversity modes are used for retransmission, then data reception quality improves, but network resources are consumed due to multiple transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reception qualityVSAvoidradio resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies diversity modes selectively rather than always. The transmitting node monitors estimated signal quality against a threshold and only activates retransmission with diversity modes when the threshold is exceeded. This partial application of retransmission resources ensures adequate reception quality is maintained only when necessary, avoiding unnecessary resource consumption during good channel conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes transmission parameters by selecting different diversity modes (time diversity with repeated blocks, frequency diversity with different frequencies, or spatial diversity with different antennas) based on current channel conditions. The transmitting node adjusts the round trip time threshold and signal quality threshold parameters to optimize the balance between reception quality and resource consumption, adapting to varying network conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If autonomous retransmission without feedback signaling is implemented, then latency is reduced and resource efficiency improves, but system complexity increases due to autonomous mode selection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidautonomous mode selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitting radio node employs relatively simple parameter-based decision logic for autonomous mode selection. The node compares estimated signal quality against a configured threshold and selects diversity modes based on round trip time measurements. This parameter-driven approach avoids complex algorithms while achieving effective autonomous retransmission, balancing productivity improvement with acceptable device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses implicit feedback mechanisms where the transmitting node monitors its own transmission performance metrics (estimated signal quality and round trip time) to determine when retransmission is needed. This self-monitoring approach provides the necessary feedback for autonomous decision-making without requiring explicit feedback signaling from the receiver, maintaining resource efficiency while enabling intelligent retransmission control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10505617B2First and second radio nodes and methods therein, for performing a radio communication
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10505617B2 patent drawing
  • US10505617B2 patent drawing
  • US10505617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first radio node (200), a second radio node (202) and methods therein, for transmitting and receiving a data block in a radio network. The first radio node (200) selects (2:1) at least one of: 1) time diversity mode, 2) frequency diversity mode, and 3) spatial diversity mode, based on a first comparison between an estimated signal quality of each diversity mode and a quality threshold, and/or a second comparison between an estimated round trip time of each diversity mode and a round trip time threshold. The first radio node (200) further performs (2:2) a first transmission of the data block, and the second radio node (202) identifies (2:3) the diversity mode(s) selected by the first radio node (200). The first radio node (200) then performs (308) a second transmission of the data block according to the selected diversity mode(s) so that the second radio node (202) can decode (2:5) the data block by combining the first and second transmissions of the data block.