Radio Node Role Selection in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication networks face challenges in adaptivity due to centralized role selection methods that do not account for local availability of devices and result in excessive signaling, especially when new nodes join the network or when device densities and topologies change.

Innovation Solution

A method for radio nodes to independently select their roles as router or non-router nodes based on detected density and other factors like route cost and interference, using a density margin and hysteresis values to optimize the number of router nodes and efficiently use spectrum resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If centralized role selection is used, then node complexity is reduced, but adaptivity to local device availability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode complexityVSAvoidadaptivity to local device availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The role selection process is segmented into two parts: centralized initialization by the root node, and distributed local decision-making by individual nodes. Nodes independently evaluate their own conditions (battery level, data queue status) and select roles autonomously after initial guidance, combining centralized coordination with local adaptivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each node makes role selection decisions based on its local conditions and characteristics rather than following uniform centralized commands. Nodes assess their own battery status, data queue depth, and network position to determine appropriate roles (router, non-router, super-saving), enabling locally optimized decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If all nodes exchange path metric information, then routing efficiency is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting efficiencyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary nodes from the routing information exchange process. Only nodes that are actually part of the data path (routers) exchange path metric information, while non-router nodes and super-saving nodes are excluded from this signaling overhead, reducing energy consumption while maintaining routing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of all nodes participating in path metric exchange, only the necessary subset (routers in the data path) perform this function. This partial action approach achieves sufficient routing efficiency without the excessive signaling overhead that would result from universal participation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If nodes dynamically switch roles, then adaptivity is improved, but network stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptivityVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Nodes perform role selection periodically based on changing conditions rather than continuously or irrevocably. The root node periodically re-evaluates and updates node roles based on current network state, allowing dynamic adaptation while maintaining periodic stability through structured re-assessment intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where nodes report their status (battery level, data queue) to the root node, which then adjusts role assignments accordingly. This feedback loop enables adaptive role switching while maintaining network stability through controlled, information-based decision-making rather than arbitrary changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3573372B1A role selection method for wireless communication systems
Publication Date: 2021.08.11 WIREPAS OY
  • EP3573372B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3573372B1 patent drawingFigure 3A
  • EP3573372B1 patent drawingFigure 3B

AI summary

The invention relates to a wireless communication system (100), comprising a plurality of radio nodes, each being able to operate at least as a router node (104) or as a non-router node (104). Each of the plurality of radio nodes is configured to: detect density of the router nodes (104) within its neighbourhood, and make a decision based on the detected density whether to operate as a router node (104) or as a non-router node (106). The invention relates also to a role selection method and a radio node device (104, 106, 500) for the wireless communication system (100).