Radio Communication Power Saving Mode Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radio communication systems, particularly those using frequency division multiplexing and TDMA protocols, are not designed for low power operation, leading to limited battery life in mobile devices, as they do not efficiently manage power consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a power saving mode that allows hardware components to be selectively powered on and off based on synchronization patterns and predefined duty cycles, using control mechanisms to transition between normal and power saving modes, ensuring minimal interference with communication protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radio communication devices operate continuously in normal mode to ensure reliable communication, then communication reliability is improved, but power consumption increases and battery life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational state of hardware components between normal mode and power saving mode based on real-time synchronization pattern detection. The controller monitors for synchronization patterns and transitions components to power saving mode when patterns are absent, while maintaining the ability to quickly return to normal mode when patterns are detected, thus adapting power consumption to actual communication needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic monitoring of synchronization patterns at defined time structures and uses predefined duty cycles to alternately activate and deactivate hardware components. This periodic check-activate-rest cycle allows the device to maintain communication reliability by periodically checking for synchronization patterns while reducing power consumption by resting components during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Speed

If hardware components are kept active to ensure immediate response to communication signals, then response time is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of synchronization patterns during defined time structures before activating full hardware operation. By detecting synchronization patterns in advance during low-power monitoring periods, the system can prepare for upcoming communication activities and activate components just in time, reducing unnecessary power consumption while maintaining responsive communication capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller autonomously monitors synchronization patterns and makes decisions about transitioning hardware components between operational modes without requiring continuous external control signals. The system serves itself by detecting communication opportunities and independently managing its own power state, balancing responsiveness with power efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Use of energy by moving object

If the device cycles frequently between receive mode and idle mode to save power, then power consumption is reduced, but the risk of missing synchronization patterns increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidsynchronization detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system cycles between receive mode and idle mode according to predefined duty cycles that are synchronized with the communication protocol's time structure. By aligning the cycling pattern with expected synchronization pattern intervals, the system ensures it is in receive mode at the appropriate times to detect synchronization patterns while spending the majority of time in low-power idle mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from synchronization pattern detection to adjust and refine its cycling behavior. When synchronization patterns are detected, the system adjusts its duty cycle and timing to ensure proper synchronization is maintained, allowing it to optimize power savings while guaranteeing reliable detection of communication signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9942842B1Power saving mode for radio communication systems
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US9942842B1 patent drawing
  • US9942842B1 patent drawing
  • US9942842B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and power saving methods are disclosed. The apparatus includes a radio communication device including at least one hardware component configured to operate in a normal mode and a power saving mode. The apparatus also includes a controller configured to monitor operations of the radio communication device and to determine whether to set the at least one hardware component to operate in the normal mode or in the power saving mode. The apparatus further includes a control mechanism associated with the at least one hardware component. The control mechanism is configured to change the operation of the at least one hardware component between the normal mode and the power saving mode based on a command received from the controller.