Radio-Tracked Safety Identification to Prevent Unnecessary Shutdowns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety systems cannot reliably identify whether an object is a person or not, which is crucial for advanced safety functions, leading to unnecessary machine shutdowns and reduced productivity, as they primarily detect basic physical features rather than specific object types.

Innovation Solution

A safety system combining a radio location system and an identification sensor, where a radio transponder on the person or object provides position data and a marking on the object supplies identification data, allowing the control and evaluation unit to verify the identity through redundant validation, enabling precise monitoring and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If basic physical feature detection is used for safety monitoring, then safety functions can be implemented, but object identification capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety function reliabilityVSAvoidobject type information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detection task into two independent parts: a radio location system for determining position and an identification sensor for determining object type. This segmentation allows each subsystem to specialize in one aspect, maintaining safety reliability while recovering object identification information that would be lost in a unified detection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control and evaluation unit acts as an intermediary that receives and correlates data from both the radio location system and identification sensor. It combines the position data and identification data to form checked person data or checked object data, enabling the system to maintain both safety monitoring and object recognition capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If object classification is performed using image data processing, then object identification is achieved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification capabilityVSAvoidsensor processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex image data processing with a direct identification sensor approach. Instead of capturing and analyzing images to determine object type, the identification sensor directly detects object characteristics and transmits identification data, significantly reducing computational complexity and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a radio transponder as a simplified copy or representation of the object's identity. Rather than analyzing the full complexity of the object through image processing, the transponder provides a direct digital representation of object identification information that can be easily processed and validated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If safety sensors monitor all objects uniformly, then safety is maintained, but productivity decreases due to unnecessary shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidmachine operational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different monitoring approaches to different objects based on their identification. Persons are monitored with both position tracking and identification verification, while other objects may receive different levels of monitoring. This localized quality approach allows the system to maintain safety for critical objects while reducing unnecessary interruptions for non-critical situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The safety monitoring system dynamically adjusts its response based on object identification. When the control and evaluation unit determines that a detected object is a person versus another type of object, it can dynamically modify machine control actions, allowing continued operation in non-hazardous situations while maintaining safety responses for person detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11674641B2Safety system
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 SICK AG
  • US11674641B2 patent drawing
  • US11674641B2 patent drawing
  • US11674641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety system and a method having a safety system for localizing and identifying a person or an object, a control and evaluation unit, at least one radio location system, and having at least one identification sensor for identifying the person or the object, wherein a marking is arranged on the person or on the object, wherein the radio location system has arranged radio stations, wherein at least one radio transponder is arranged on the person or on the object, wherein position data of the person or of the object can be determined by means of the radio location system, and wherein the position data can be transmitted from the radio station of the radio location system to the control and evaluation unit, and identification data from the marking on the person or the object can be determined by means of the identification sensor.