Radio Terminal Selection for Ultra-Dense Antenna Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In ultra-high-density distributed antenna systems, existing methods for selecting radio terminals for scheduling often prioritize those with favorable radio quality, leading to poor service quality for terminals with high communication quality but poor radio quality, resulting in degraded service quality and increased processing load.

Innovation Solution

A control apparatus that selects radio terminals based on predetermined criteria for service quality, determining whether each terminal meets delay requirements and allocating resources accordingly, thereby reducing the number of terminals for scheduling without degrading service quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If radio terminals with favorable radio quality are preferentially selected for scheduling, then the processing load is reduced, but service quality for radio terminals with poor radio quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection criterion from radio quality alone to a composite criterion that includes both radio quality and service quality parameters. The selection unit evaluates multiple parameters including delay requirements, transmission opportunities, and radio quality to select radio terminals for scheduling, thereby resolving the contradiction between processing efficiency and service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic selection criteria that adapt based on service quality requirements. The selection unit dynamically adjusts which radio terminals are selected for scheduling by evaluating whether delay requirements are met and whether transmission opportunities have been provided, making the selection process flexible rather than static based solely on radio quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the number of radio terminals for scheduling is reduced, then processing load decreases, but service quality for some radio terminals degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing loadVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection criterion from radio quality alone to a composite criterion that includes both radio quality and service quality parameters. The selection unit evaluates multiple parameters including delay requirements, transmission opportunities, and radio quality to select radio terminals for scheduling, thereby resolving the contradiction between processing efficiency and service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the selection unit continuously evaluates whether delay requirements are met and whether transmission opportunities have been provided to radio terminals. This feedback loop ensures that service quality is maintained while managing processing load, as the selection criteria are adjusted based on observed service quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If radio resources are allocated based on radio quality, then communication efficiency improves, but service quality for terminals with poor radio quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the resource allocation criterion from radio quality alone to a composite criterion that includes both radio quality and service quality parameters. The allocation unit considers delay requirements, transmission opportunities, and radio quality when allocating radio resources, ensuring that terminals with poor radio quality but high service quality requirements receive appropriate resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic selection criteria that adapt based on service quality requirements. The selection unit dynamically adjusts which radio terminals are selected for scheduling by evaluating whether delay requirements are met and whether transmission opportunities have been provided, making the selection process flexible rather than static based solely on radio quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240056893A1Control apparatus, communication system, control method, and non-transitory computer-readable medium
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 NEC CORP
  • US20240056893A1 patent drawing
  • US20240056893A1 patent drawing
  • US20240056893A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control apparatus (10) according to the present disclosure includes a selection unit (11) configured to select a plurality of radio terminals that perform wireless communication through one of a plurality of antennas included in a wireless network at a predetermined timing, a determination unit (12) configured to determine combinations of the plurality of antennas and the selected plurality of radio terminals, and an allocation unit (13) configured to allocate radio resources for performing wireless communication at the predetermined timing, to the plurality of radio terminals, and the selection unit (11) selects a plurality of radio terminals from all radio terminals so as to satisfy delay requirements determined for data to be transmitted or received by all the radio terminals capable of performing wireless communication through one of the plurality of antennas.