Radio Transmission Device Stop Condition Assessment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current radio transmission devices in the 920 MHz band fail to distinguish between different transmission stop conditions (A, B, and C), leading to inefficient transmission rates and unclear processing for the upper layer processing module, as they treat all conditions as the same error, resulting in unnecessary delays and unclear handling of transmission errors.
Innovation Solution
A radio transmission device equipped with a stop condition assessment module and a stop reason reporting module that determines the specific type of transmission stop condition (A, B, or C) and provides this information to the upper layer processing module, allowing for targeted handling and efficient retransmission strategies.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If the stop condition checking module treats all transmission stop conditions (A, B, and C) as the same error, then the device structure remains simple, but the transmission rate decreases and the upper layer processing becomes unclear
Solution Approach 1:
The invention segments the transmission stop conditions into three distinct types (A, B, and C) with different causes and handling requirements. The stop condition assessment module identifies which specific condition is met, and the stop reason reporting module reports the specific type to the upper layer processing module. This segmentation allows for optimized handling of each condition type, improving transmission rate while maintaining clear processing logic.
2Loss of information
If the stop condition checking module provides detailed information about transmission stop conditions to the upper layer processing module, then the processing clarity improves, but the device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The invention introduces two intermediary modules: the stop condition assessment module and the stop reason reporting module. These modules act as mediators between the stop condition checking module and the upper layer processing module. They provide the necessary information about transmission stop conditions without requiring complex integration between all components, thus maintaining manageable device complexity while improving processing clarity.
3Productivity
If the device implements differentiated handling for different transmission stop conditions, then the transmission efficiency improves, but the device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The invention segments the error handling process into distinct paths based on the type of transmission stop condition identified. Each condition type (A, B, and C) has its own optimized handling strategy, allowing the device to improve transmission efficiency by applying the appropriate handling method while keeping the overall processing complexity manageable through clear segmentation.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention implements dynamic error handling where the processing approach changes based on the identified stop condition type. The stop condition assessment module dynamically determines which condition is met, and the system adapts its handling strategy accordingly, optimizing transmission efficiency for each scenario while maintaining a unified device structure.
Data Source
AI summary
A radio transmission device may comprise a stop condition assessment module and a stop reason reporting module. The stop condition assessment module may be configured to, in response to an occurrence of a transmission stop condition, determine at least a type of the transmission stop condition. The stop reason reporting module may be configured to send information relating to the transmission stop condition to an upper layer processing module.