Two-Stage Radioactive Particulate Filtration With Backwash Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing filtration systems for radioactive particulates in nuclear facilities face challenges in achieving high throughput, longevity, and cost-effectiveness due to limitations in filter design and regeneration methods, leading to high disposal costs and potential equipment degradation.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage filtration system is employed, with the first stage designed for high flowrate and low differential pressure, and the second stage for high differential pressure and low flowrate, utilizing ultrasonic energy for backwashing and incorporating radiation-resistant media to enhance particulate loading and system integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single stage filtration system is used, then the device complexity is low, but the filtration efficiency and particulate loading capacity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiencyVSAvoidfiltration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The filtration system is divided into two distinct stages: a first stage filter designed for high flowrate and low differential pressure operation, and a second stage filter designed for high differential pressure and low flowrate operation. Each stage is optimized for specific conditions, allowing the system to achieve superior filtration efficiency while managing complexity through functional specialization rather than a single complex filter design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If filter operating pressure is increased to improve particulate capture, then filtration efficiency improves, but energy consumption and equipment degradation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticulate capture efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the filtration process into two pressure regimes: the first stage operates at low differential pressure (high flowrate condition) for general particulate removal, while the second stage operates at high differential pressure (low flowrate condition) for enhanced particulate capture. This segmentation allows efficient particulate capture without continuously operating at high pressure, thereby reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters between the two stages: the first stage uses high flowrate and low differential pressure, while the second stage uses low flowrate and high differential pressure. By adjusting these parameters according to the filtration requirements at each stage, the system achieves effective particulate capture while minimizing energy consumption compared to continuous high-pressure operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If filter media pore size is decreased to improve particulate retention, then filtration efficiency improves, but flowrate capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticulate retention efficiencyVSAvoidflowrate capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the filtration function across two stages with different pore size characteristics: the first stage filter uses larger pore sizes to maintain high flowrate capacity for general particulate removal, while the second stage filter uses smaller pore sizes to achieve high particulate retention efficiency. This segmentation allows the system to simultaneously achieve both high flowrate capacity and high retention efficiency by distributing the filtration load across two optimized stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves improved filtration efficiency, reduced energy consumption, and lower disposal costs by increasing filter loading capacity, extending equipment lifespan, and ensuring safe disposal of radioactive particulates.

Implementation Method 1

Ultrasonic energy may be used to disrupt, dislodge and flush the particulates from the medium by cavitation or acoustic streaming

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

Ultrasonic energy may be used to disrupt, dislodge and flush the particulates from the medium by cavitation or acoustic streaming

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentUS12548685B2Method and apparatus for improved removal and retention of radioactive particulates from fluids
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 VRD LLC
  • US12548685B2 patent drawing
  • US12548685B2 patent drawing
  • US12548685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for improved separation and containment of radioactive particulates from liquids by filtration. The improvements are achieved by utilizing more than one stage of filtration to remove radioactive particulates from a fluid. The first stage of filtration is designed for high liquid flowrate, low differential pressure across the filter medium, and reversibility of flow through the medium to facilitate backwashing. The second or more stages of filtration receive the backwash flow and captured particulates from the first stage at a lower flowrate, but at high pressure using a high-pressure pump configured between the stages.