Dynamic Radiographing Control for Analysis-Specific Image Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dynamic radiographing systems set a constant target image quality regardless of the presence or absence of dynamic analysis, leading to issues such as low image quality and high patient dose during certain dynamic analysis items.

Innovation Solution

A radiographing control apparatus that determines first and second radiographing conditions based on information about the presence or absence of dynamic analysis and the specific dynamic analysis item, thereby adjusting the target image quality and optimizing the radiographing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a constant target image quality is set for all dynamic radiographing cases, then the device operation is simplified, but the image quality becomes insufficient for certain dynamic analysis items and the patient dose becomes unnecessarily high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of setting radiographing conditionsVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the target image quality adjustable based on the type of dynamic analysis being performed. The system transitions from a fixed constant quality setting to a dynamic quality setting that adapts to different analysis requirements (e.g., motion analysis vs. positional analysis), thereby optimizing both image quality and patient dose for each specific application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of target image quality from a constant value to a variable value that depends on the dynamic analysis type. By linking the quality parameter to the analysis item selection, the system can optimize radiographing conditions to achieve sufficient image quality for each analysis purpose while minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If a high target image quality is set to ensure sufficient image quality for all analysis items, then the image quality is sufficient, but the patient dose becomes unnecessarily high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidpatient dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the target image quality parameter by setting it according to the specific dynamic analysis item. For analysis items requiring high quality (e.g., positional analysis), higher quality settings are applied, while for items tolerating lower quality (e.g., motion analysis), lower quality settings are used, thereby reducing patient dose while maintaining sufficient image quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by setting the target image quality to the minimum necessary level for each specific analysis item rather than using a uniformly high quality setting for all cases. This ensures sufficient image quality for the intended analysis while avoiding excessive radiation exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a low target image quality is set to reduce patient dose, then the patient dose is reduced, but the image quality becomes insufficient for certain dynamic analysis items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient doseVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the target image quality parameter dynamically based on the analysis item selection. The system ensures that for each analysis type, the quality parameter is set to an appropriate level that provides sufficient image quality for that specific analysis while minimizing patient dose, rather than using a uniformly low quality setting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If radiographing conditions are optimized for specific dynamic analysis items, then the image quality and dose are optimized, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcomplexity of radiographing control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-functionality by creating a unified control system that handles multiple dynamic analysis items through a single mechanism. The radiographing control apparatus integrates the functionality to select analysis items, determine appropriate target image qualities, and optimize radiographing conditions within one system, avoiding the need for separate specialized systems for each analysis type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for more suitable radiographing conditions to be set for dynamic radiographing, improving image quality and reducing patient dose by tailoring the radiographing conditions to the specific dynamic analysis requirements.

Implementation Method 1

a radiographing control apparatus emitting radiation to an object and obtaining a plurality of frame images to control dynamic radiographing that radiographs dynamics of the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-Ray: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentUS12343192B2Radiographing control apparatus, recording medium, and radiographing system
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US12343192B2 patent drawing
  • US12343192B2 patent drawing
  • US12343192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiographing control apparatus emits radiation to an object and obtains a plurality of frame images to control dynamic radiographing that radiographs dynamics of the object. The radiographing control apparatus includes a hardware processor. The hardware processor obtains first order information that includes at least one of information on presence or absence of dynamic analysis executed for a dynamic image obtained by the dynamic radiographing, and information on a dynamic analysis item, determines a first radiographing condition and a target image quality, based on the obtained first order information, and determines a second radiographing condition for achieving the determined target image quality.