Radioisotope Target Container With Variable Wall Thickness
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing radioisotope production methods face challenges with fragile and difficult-to-assemble target assemblies, inefficient energy transmission due to thick windows, and high energy losses, which complicate the production of radioisotopes like 18F, requiring aggressive cooling and higher proton energies.
Innovation Solution
A container with a thin metal jacket of varying thickness, fabricated using electroforming techniques, providing improved beam transparency and mechanical resistance, integrated with a target assembly that allows for easy assembly, rotation, and efficient cooling, minimizing energy loss and production costs.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of energy
If a thin window is used to allow beam passage, then beam transparency is improved, but mechanical strength and thermal resistance deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The container wall is segmented into two distinct zones: a thin fraction (5-100 μm) for beam transparency and a thick fraction (>100 μm) for mechanical strength. This segmentation allows each zone to fulfill its specific function optimally without compromising the other.
Solution Approach 2:
Different parts of the container wall have different thicknesses tailored to their specific functions. The thin fraction is positioned where beam passage is required, while the thick fraction is positioned where mechanical support and thermal resistance are needed, creating local quality variations that resolve the contradiction.
2Reliability
If a thick window is used to withstand mechanical and thermal stresses, then structural reliability is improved, but beam transparency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The container wall is segmented into two distinct zones: a thin fraction (5-100 μm) for beam transparency and a thick fraction (>100 μm) for mechanical strength. This segmentation allows each zone to fulfill its specific function optimally without compromising the other.
Solution Approach 2:
Different parts of the container wall have different thicknesses tailored to their specific functions. The thin fraction is positioned where beam passage is required, while the thick fraction is positioned where mechanical support and thermal resistance are needed, creating local quality variations that resolve the contradiction.
3Loss of energy
If a fragile assembly is used to achieve thin wall structure, then beam transparency is improved, but ease of assembly and reliability deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The thin wall fraction and thick wall fraction are merged into a single integral container structure produced by electroforming. This eliminates the need for fragile assemblies of multiple thin components, while maintaining beam transparency and structural reliability through the monolithic construction.
Solution Approach 2:
The electroforming process parameters are controlled to produce the desired thickness gradient from thin to thick fraction within a single piece, transforming the container from a fragile multi-component assembly to a reliable integral structure with optimized thickness distribution.
4Temperature
If aggressive cooling is applied to handle high power dissipation, then thermal management is improved, but device complexity and energy loss increase
Solution Approach 1:
The container wall thickness is optimized locally to minimize beam energy loss while maintaining sufficient structural integrity for cooling. The thin fraction reduces unnecessary energy absorption in the wall itself, decreasing the cooling load and associated energy losses.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The solution enables reliable, efficient, and cost-effective production of radioisotopes by reducing energy loss, simplifying assembly, and allowing for internal or external target use, while minimizing material waste and operator exposure to radiation.
Implementation Method 1
the wall of said jacket having a thin fraction, of a thickness comprised between 5 and 100 μm
Implementation Method 2
fabricated using electroforming techniques
Implementation Method 3
integrated with a target assembly that allows for easy assembly, rotation, and efficient cooling
Implementation Method 4
efficient cooling, minimizing energy loss
Data Source
AI summary
The invention relates to a container (100, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910) for the production of radioisotopes by irradiation of a precursor material formed by a one-piece metal casing, the wall of said casing including one thin portion (130) having a thickness of between 5 and 100 μm, the remainder having a thickness greater than 100 μm. The invention also relates to a method for obtaining the container and to a target assembly using same.


