Radiologist Workflow Management System for Dynamic Exam Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In healthcare environments, managing radiologist workloads and distributing medical exams efficiently is challenging due to time-consuming processes and inefficiencies, leading to inequities in exam distribution across networks of radiologists and hospitals, lacking effective tools for workflow management and dynamic adjustments based on metric analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for managing radiologist workflows that includes interfaces for monitoring exam distribution status, viewing metrics, and configuring rules for exam allocation, with automated updates to optimize exam distribution and workflow efficiency, utilizing graphical user interfaces and load-balancing rules to allocate exams based on radiologist availability, exam characteristics, and institutional goals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used to manage exam distribution, then flexibility in workflow management is maintained, but time consumption and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexam distribution efficiencyVSAvoidtime for workflow management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic exam distribution where the system itself performs the allocation task without requiring manual intervention. The automated distribution mechanism analyzes radiologist workloads, exam characteristics, and institutional goals to autonomously allocate exams, thereby eliminating time-consuming manual processes while maintaining workflow flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical processes for exam distribution are replaced with an automated computational system. The system uses algorithms to process distribution rules, monitor workloads, and allocate exams automatically, substituting human manual operations with an efficient automated mechanism that reduces time consumption and increases productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated allocation is implemented, then workflow efficiency improves, but adaptability to dynamic changes may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow efficiencyVSAvoidworkflow adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated allocation system is designed to be dynamic rather than static. It continuously monitors radiologist workloads, exam characteristics, and institutional goals, and automatically adjusts distribution rules in real-time based on changing conditions. This dynamic capability allows the system to maintain high workflow efficiency while adapting flexibly to dynamic changes in the healthcare environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor workflow metrics and distribution outcomes. Based on this feedback, the automated allocation mechanism adjusts its behavior to optimize efficiency while maintaining adaptability. The feedback loop ensures the system can respond to dynamic changes by learning from actual performance data and modifying allocation strategies accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If manual monitoring and adjustment of exam distribution is performed, then control over workflow is maintained, but inequities in distribution persist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution equityVSAvoiddistribution process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors and adjusts exam distribution based on predefined rules and real-time data, eliminating the need for manual intervention. This self-service capability ensures equitable distribution by objectively applying consistency criteria to all radiologists, preventing the biases and inefficiencies inherent in manual monitoring while maintaining full control over the distribution process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive metric analysis is implemented, then data-driven decision making improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetric analysis accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions including monitoring, analysis, rule configuration, and automated allocation within a single unified platform. This multi-functional design allows comprehensive metric analysis to be performed without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same infrastructure supports multiple operations. The system can analyze various metrics related to workloads, exam characteristics, and distribution outcomes while maintaining a cohesive and manageable architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9558323B2Systems and methods for workflow modification through metric analysis
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US9558323B2 patent drawing
  • US9558323B2 patent drawing
  • US9558323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example system to manage a radiologist workflow includes a first interface to monitor a distribution status of at least one medical exam. The medical exam is to be at least one of automatically allocated or assigned to an examiner work queue based on one or more rules. The example system includes a second interface to view at least one metric associated with distribution of the at least one medical exam and an assignment tool to be displayed via the first interface. The assignment tool is to facilitate assignment of the medical exam to an examiner work queue. The example system includes a rules viewer to be displayed via a third interface. The rules viewer is to facilitate configuration of the one or more rules based on the distribution status, the at least one metric, or the assignment. The rules viewer is to automatically update the one or more rules.