Radiology Workstation Manipulator for Automated Detector Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiography systems lack the ability to automatically position and prepare non-motorized components such as detectors, grids, and filters, requiring manual intervention and increasing the risk of errors and costs.

Innovation Solution

A manipulator device with a sensor unit and automatic manipulator unit that can locate and position non-motorized components using machine learning algorithms, such as artificial neural networks, to automate the setup of a radiology workstation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual positioning of non-motorized components is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases and reliability worsens due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensor units to automatically detect and locate non-motorized components, and the manipulator unit autonomously positions them without human intervention. The control unit coordinates the entire process based on sensor data, enabling the system to serve itself in the positioning task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical positioning by operators is replaced with an automated manipulator unit controlled by sensor feedback. The sensor unit detects component locations and the manipulator unit mechanically positions components based on this data, substituting human-operated mechanical systems with sensor-controlled automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If multiple detectors are purchased to cover all positions, then reliability is improved, but loss of substance increases due to higher costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination availabilityVSAvoiddetector cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A single detector is designed to perform multiple functions by being manually or automatically positioned at different locations (tabletop, wall-mounted, freely positionable). The detector serves universal purposes across multiple examination configurations, eliminating the need for multiple dedicated detectors for each position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, fixed-position detectors to a dynamic setup where a single detector can be moved and repositioned as needed. The manipulator unit enables dynamic repositioning of the detector to different locations based on examination requirements, making the system adaptable rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If manual component handling is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision worsens due to positioning errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor unit continuously monitors and detects the positions of non-motorized components, providing feedback data to the control unit. This feedback enables the manipulator unit to adjust its positioning actions to achieve accurate placement, with the sensor verifying the final position for precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor unit acts as an intermediary between the manipulator unit and the non-motorized components. It detects component locations and communicates this information to the control unit, which then guides the manipulator unit's positioning actions, ensuring accurate placement without direct human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If automated manipulator unit is added, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroom preparation speedVSAvoidmanipulator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is divided into distinct functional modules: sensor units for detection, manipulator units for physical positioning, and control units for coordination. This segmentation allows each component to be independently optimized and maintained, managing overall system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor unit, manipulator unit, and control unit are merged into an integrated automated positioning system that works together as a coordinated whole. The control unit combines data from sensor units and directs manipulator units, creating a unified automated workflow for room preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3797700B1Manipulator device for automatically adjusting a radiology workstation
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • EP3797700B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3797700B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3797700B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a manipulator device (2) for automatically setting up a radiology workstation of an imaging system (1) comprising - a sensor unit (5) for locating at least one movable component (18) of the radiology workstation, and - an automatic manipulator unit (3) for mechanically receiving the component and positioning the component at a position provided for the examination.