Radiology Exam Program Selection From RIS Comments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiological examination processes lack a standardized, technology-assisted end-to-end process for defining optimal imaging programs, relying heavily on manual interpretation and selection by skilled personnel, which is prone to errors, time-consuming, and laborious.

Innovation Solution

An automated method and apparatus that utilize character string comparisons and semantic analysis to select radiological examination programs from a radiology information system (RIS) comment field, incorporating logical operators and machine learning to streamline the selection process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual interpretation and selection of examination programs is performed by radiologists or technicians, then accurate program selection can be achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram selection accuracyVSAvoidexamination planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of the RIS comment and pre-selects suitable examination programs before the technologist needs to make a final selection. This reduces the time required for program selection while maintaining accuracy through the automated comparison process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated program selection system acts as an intermediary between the RIS comment input and the final examination program selection. This intermediary automatically compares the comment with available programs and presents pre-selected options, reducing both time and manual effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual selection of examination programs is performed, then flexibility in handling complex cases is maintained, but the process is prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by automatically comparing the RIS comment with the available examination programs and presenting the best matches. This automated feedback loop reduces human error while maintaining flexibility, as the technologist can review and adjust the automated suggestions if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of interpreting RIS comments and selecting programs is replaced with an automated computer-based system that performs string comparison and program selection, thereby eliminating human error while preserving adaptability through configurable matching rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If detailed information is entered into the RIS comment field, then sufficient information is available for program selection, but the information may be misplaced or ambiguously formatted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated program selection system acts as an intermediary that handles the complexity of parsing and interpreting RIS comments with various formats. It automatically extracts relevant information regardless of how it is formatted in the comment field, making the system robust to information placement variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of information processing by using flexible string comparison algorithms that can handle various formats and placements of information within the RIS comment. This allows the system to extract meaningful data regardless of the specific format or position of the information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated program selection is implemented, then time efficiency is improved, but the system may lack the nuanced understanding of complex medical cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination planning efficiencyVSAvoidclinical judgment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs preliminary program selection based on the RIS comment, providing a starting point that saves time. The technologist then performs a final review and adjustment if needed, combining automated efficiency with human clinical judgment for complex cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system performs partial program selection rather than complete autonomous selection. It handles the routine aspects of program selection automatically while leaving room for human intervention in complex or ambiguous cases, thus achieving a balance between automation and clinical judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260013820A1Method and Device for Automated Planning of a Radiological Examination
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20260013820A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to automated planning of a radiological examination, comprising providing information about a pending examination of a patient from a radiology information system) and providing at least one RIS comment relating to the examination. The automated planning also includes comparing, in an automated manner, character strings in the RIS comment with names of examination programs in a specified examination list, and selecting a number of examination programs for these character strings based on the comparison. Finally, the selected examination programs are output.